返回列表 发帖

5/63-T9请教

搜了一下,看到了前人的解释,现在知道定位了,但能不能解释下内部逻辑,为什么A对了就能削弱?

How many really suffer as a result of labor market problems?(提出问题:多少人受到职业市场的影响)This is one of the most critical yet contentious (contentious :causing a lot of argument and disagreement between people)social policy questions. In many ways, our social statistics exaggerate the degree of hardship. Unemployment does not have the same dire consequences today as it did in the 1930’s when most of the unemployed were primary breadwinners, when income and earnings were usually much closer to the margin of subsistence(subsistence :the condition of only just having enough money or food to stay alive), and when there were no countervailing (with an equally strong but opposite effect ) social programs for those failing in the labor market. Increasing affluence, the rise of families with more than one wage earner, the growing predominance of secondary earners among the unemployed, and improved social welfare protection have unquestionably mitigated the consequences of joblessness. (社会数据夸大了困难程度,以当今与1930对比)Earnings and income data also overstate the dimensions of hardship.(收入数据也夸大了困难程度) Among the millions with hourly earnings at or below the minimum wage level, the overwhelming majority are from multiple-earner, relatively affluent families. Most of those counted by the poverty statistics are elderly or handicapped or have family responsibilities which keep them out of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means an accurate indicator of labor market pathologies.提出问题:提出问题:多少人受到职业市场的影响。论据一:社会数据和收入数据夸大了困难程度,由当今与1930年对比。




Yet there are also many ways our social statistics underestimate the degree of labor-market-related hardship. The unemployment counts exclude the millions of fully employed workers whose wages are so low that their families remain in poverty. Low wages and repeated or prolonged unemployment frequently interact to undermine the capacity for self-support. Since the number experiencing joblessness at some time during the year is several times the number unemployed in any month, those who suffer as a result of forced idleness can equal or exceed average annual unemployment, even though only a minority of the jobless in any month really suffer. For every person counted in the monthly unemployment tallies, there is another working part-time because of the inability to find full-time work, or else outside the labor force but wanting a job. Finally, income transfers in our country have always focused on the elderly, disabled, and dependent, neglecting the needs of the working poor, so that the dramatic expansion of cash and in-kind transfers does not necessarily mean that those failing in the labor market are adequately protected.论据二:社会数据低估了困难。低收入者,多次失业者,零时工、劳动穷人




As a result of such contradictory evidence, it is uncertain whether those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems number in the hundreds of thousands or the tens of millions, and, hence, whether high levels of joblessness can be tolerated or must be countered by job creation and economic stimulus. There is only one area of agreement in this debate—that the existing poverty, employment, and earnings statistics are inadequate for one their primary applications, measuring the consequences of labor market problems.结论:数据不足以反映劳动市场的困难。




9.     Which of the following, if true, is the best criticism of the author’s argument concerning why poverty statistics cannot properly be used to show the effects of problems in the labor market?这题花了2分18秒,做错了,选了C,削弱题


(A)   A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.


As a result of such contradictory evidence, it is uncertain whether those suffering seriously as a result of labor market problems number in the hundreds of thousands or the tens of millions, and, hence, whether high levels of joblessness can be tolerated or must be countered by job creation and economic stimulus.


(B) For those who are in poverty as a result of joblessness, there are social programs available that provide a minimum standard of living.


(C) Poverty statistics do not consistently agree with earnings statistics, when each is taken as a measure of hardship resulting from unemployment.


(D) The elderly and handicapped categories include many who previously were employed in the labor market.(A)


(E) Since the labor market is global in nature, poor workers in one country are competing with poor workers in another with respect to the level of wages and the existence of jobs.


哈 這題我也做錯 不過後來發現我應該是定位錯了
應該要定位再第一段
Most of those counted by the poverty statistics are elderly or   

handicapped or have family responsibilities which keep them out

of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means

an accurate indicator of labor market pathologies病狀.



(A) A short-term increase in the number of those in poverty can indicate a shortage of jobs because the basic number of those unable to accept employment remains approximately constant.

  原文說
          那些貧窮數據裡面的人
          都是老人或是殘障者
          所以不能代表勞力市場的問題
          問反駁

  答
          如果短期貧窮人口數字上漲的話還是可以視為是工作短缺
          因為那些不能工作的人的數字
          是一樣的

大家在討論討論
收藏 分享

我来试一试:
Most of those counted by the poverty statistics are elderly or   
handicapped or have family responsibilities which keep them out
of the labor force, so the poverty statistics are by no means
an accurate indicator of labor market pathologies

这段话说:贫穷统计里面,多数都是老人、残障者或有家庭责任的人,因此不能准确反应劳动市场病态。意思是劳动市场的统计应该是统计的那些有劳动能力的人,有劳动能力而没有工作的人的失业才算真正的失业,没有劳动能力的人的无工作不能算失业,不能算在失业统计里面。因此,贫穷人数的增长不能准确反应工作岗位的短缺,那些贫穷的人有可能是因为没有劳动能力而贫穷,而并非找不到工作而贫穷。这就是作者的观点。
A选项说:贫穷人数的增长可以反应工作岗位的短缺,因为没有劳动能力的人的基数是基本稳定的。意思就是说增长的贫穷人数有肯定是因为找不到工作而贫穷,正好与作者相反。

供讨论~~~

TOP

恩 如果选C的话 则起到了支持作者的作用  因为如果poverty不能反映earning 也就是不能反映joblessness的情况 则退出poverty statistics不能反映就业状况 岂不是支持了作者? 呵呵 愚见~~

TOP

其实只要和问题对照,答案非常明显
问题中poverty  statistics      cannot be used to show         the effects
A答案increase in poverty     can indicate                         a shortage of jobs
上下一对应 非常明显的criticism~~

TOP

赞LZ,这个对应太神了,呵呵
可惜实战用不到啊

TOP

其实只要和问题对照,答案非常明显
问题中poverty  statistics      cannot be used to show         the  ...
llqq1220 发表于 2011-11-1 06:27



这个太神了啊!!神对照!!!这个实战可以用。。。要不然从全文分析起来太浪费时间了。。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看