返回列表 发帖
自然科学类
*2.1.1 超新星爆炸
V1 By gmat新手22
有一篇阅读提到超新星爆炸后,产生一种pulsa,这种东西随着年龄增长,速度会减慢并且不再发光。第二段说有一种特例就是这种pulsa会吸收周围的东西变成另一种mili..., 它的速度可以维持。。问题有涉及第一段谈到的Crab pulsa,和 第二段的mili...

V2 by pizzahutgg
还考到超新星crab pulsar!!,这个超级长,解释超新星爆炸以后的残留物,然后说这个东西怎么再变化。

V3 By feelchilly
星星喷发题:第一段:有一种星星会喷发出一些粒子,跟喷出一束光差不多那样,这些星星会慢慢的旋转,然后等它们老了之后就转不动了,有一种星叫做crab pulsar什么的,这个螃蟹星呢,因为转得很快,所以很年轻,而且发现它们是存在于某一种物质的遗留体中的。这有一个问题:问专家怎么确定螃蟹星很年轻的,问哪个正确。一个项是它转很快,一个是它在某物质的遗留体中,我选前面的。第二段:讲有一些星星虽然很老但还是转得很快,说不停的吸收周围的星体,老星星们周围都有很多伙伴星星,这些伙伴星星就可以证明老星星为何越老越精神了。举了个例说只有1%的第一种星星旁边有伙伴,问这个例子说明什么。

V4 by  吟行
关于超新星的事儿。 提及了binary system
考了一个 1%的概念,问为啥提这个one percent?
貌似考了第一段的题目,问这个puslar,crab star之类的性质啊?
massive,
radiation,
faster,
born to be an ordinary puslar
这类,以上为四个选项大意。

考古
超新星辐射
by sapan    (710)有一个讲supernovaremainant是一个发光体,但发发就没了。比如举了个例子叫什么crab palmur。就很年轻。题有一个问,为什么知道这个crabpalmur年轻?答因为从那个remainant里面发现的所以年轻。因为第二段又发现一种好几billion那么老的也发光,为什么?因为有行星。主题题考的本文说什么?回答是要解释一个新现象。
By penny890504我同意sapan(710)版本的两道题答案,应该是正确的。我这篇的第一道是下面哪项是不正确的?答案不记得,但是是需要通篇看全文的。
by Pudgysphere有一篇是说超新星辐射的
第一段大致说,超新星爆炸形成中子什么星P(拼写记不清),然后就不停的辐射,射到射不动什么的。
第二段说新发现了一种M(拼写记不清)星,形成过程和P星一样,但却一直很能射。研究发现M星一般都有compensation星跟着。M星把compensation星tear apart(好像是说把compensation星质量吸过来,后文有印证),compensation星使M星转得更快。于是天文学家猜想是compensation星使M星这么能射的。
然后说三个其他发现证实了这种猜想。第一,确实观察到质量从compensation星转移到M星。第二好像是说什么brial系统(记不清了)。第三,虽然观察到有单独的M星,说理由很简单,compensation星被吸光了。

TOP

*2.1.2 地震
V1 By gmat新手22
还有一篇谈到地震一般发生在离地球表面近的地方,第二段提到了也有发生在更深的地方的地震,M..是一种crystallic structure, 问M..和普通的地震的区别。

V2 By luckyxmx
阅读还有那个地震考古的,第一段说一个广泛认知是大部分地震都在30mile的浅层,说了一下发生的原理,第二段比较长,说120?到400mile的深层其实也有地震,是因为深层的crystal structure变化神马的,然后介绍了两个mechanism的概念,mechanism1 怎么运作,mechanism2 怎么运作。。。

V3 By flow123flow
还有一篇是关于地震的。
通常科学家认为地震都发生在surface。 并给论据。
但是,1930年在某某地方发生的地震却在很深的地方。通常人认为的的证是phase ____(此处为一个单词太长了,记不住)。 PHASE ____  ACCOUNT FOR SUDDEN CHANGES 发生在深处的是另一类。

V4 By dawnie
关于地震的。一般地震发生在30mile以内,因为普遍认为在地壳更深处因为压力和温度岩石融化了不能引发地震。但是有一些地震发生在100到400Miles,文章主要介绍了为什么。这些地方的温度和压力让岩石的分子发生了改变,改变有两种,一种是缓慢的不会引发地震,另一种是会引起震动。。。

V5 By kimtara
只有一篇比较长。是关于地震的。说科学家都认为地震只发生在地表。深30还是四十mile以下的地方。后来又发现其实不是,有证据发现地震在很深很深(几百miles还是一百几miles)的地方也发生过。

V6 by njim
阅读有一篇写地震的,讲浅表地震,和深层地震

V7 By feelchilly
地震题:第一段:传统理论认为地震会受高压、高温等一些原因影响,大多数记录证明认为多发生于离地表30米以内;第二段,科学家发现有些发生在很深的地方,解释了为神马:1、可能由于由于相互作用慢慢地挤压了一个水晶体2、可能由于某些东西作用快快地挤压了一个水晶体。有一个题是问最常见的地震的发生符合哪些选项,我选的是符合了传统的理论,另有一个选项是受到高温影响,这个不太确定。偶选的前面个

V8 by CarsickBike
阅读还遇到地震深浅层了 丧失思考能力 不记得选项有没有变体了 考大家都选solve a puzzle的主旨题了

V9 by starmirror
第三篇是地震啥的,一开始是论点说30miles,后来么发现40-120miles也是一个theory说是改变了什么晶体结构,然后就导致在深的地方也能够地震啥的。。。诶。记性不好

考古
【已确认】
V1  【by: lewisray820  690】
说地震的,就2段。 第一段,说传统中广大淫民认为地震发生在浅层靠近地幔30mile的地方,然后具体说了下是怎么样发生的,是个神马样子的。第二段,就Yet开头鸟,说有地震时400mile以下的鸟,提供2个概念的对比,一个是上面的那种什么mechanism,另外一种是新的一种mechanism。第一种慢,由热力和压力共同作用于石头结构,最后引起crystal structure的崩裂;第二种快,不仅仅限于low pressure,可以一下子就搞定它的crystal structure。
问题有:1。。。。忘记鸟。
2, 第二段是什么作用:我选的是提供exception of the theory mentioned in the first passage。3,那2个mechanism的相关比较:选他们都摧残了crystal structure。

V2  【by: lTopway  750】
第一段说大部分地震都是浅层的,然后将浅层地震时怎么产生的,由于深处压力太大,所以没法达到地震的条件。
第二段说,其实有很多地震都是深层的。然后提出两个理论解释深层地震。第一个理论提到压力下结构变化会让物质A变成物质A'(名字忘了),第二个理论,对此进行补充,说物质A变成物质A'的过程太慢,不足以形成地震的必须条件,所以应该是物质B的结构变化,变成B'。(问题:大意是物质A'和B'的共同点?自然就是他们的结构都改变过)

V3  【by: vagreen】
一个地震的。第一段说以前认为地震都是由于近地面的岩石活动造成的……第二段转折了,说也有很多是由于地名一下很深的某种XX地质活动造成的,详细讲了两种XX效应,名字n长,忘了(有题比较这两者)。

V4  【by: nyliangnan  730】
说地震的,一般地震都是发生在100miles deepth以内,但是还有的发生在100miles以外。然后科学家给了两种解释,第一种是说,地下的压力和温度很大,导致100miles以外的那些crystalized成分变成固体。但是有人说了,这种变化很缓慢,不会导致灾难性的地震。然后那个科学家又提出一个理论,说虽然没有变成固体,但是他们会震动,导致震动传递。
我的理解是这样的,大家别太信了,知道这么个事情。我怕我的理解会有偏差,误导大家

V5  【by: ritarong】
题目:(不按顺序的)
1.写法主旨题
2.高亮整个第二段,问第二段在干嘛。这题楼主用的排除法,选了一个带exception的选项,有一个选项挺迷惑的,因为它的叙述基本跟上面那个写法主旨题一样,神马alternative的,但是它出现了一个词叫phenomena,于是lz果断排除了。。
3.问关于p型地震(浅层的)和m型地震(深的)下面哪个是对的 有个选项有点迷惑说他们都在400km以内 lz犹豫了一哈字还是选了结构改变那个

V6  【by: 谢家树  750】11.6日
狗狗已经说的非常详细了,我补充下题目,第一个主旨题,选解决了一个长久存在的科学疑团;第二题问第二段作用,我选提出了对第一段的一个地震理论的特例;三是问深源地震两种形成机制的共同点,就是都摧残了一个晶体结构。

V7  【by: joyzhuoy  730】11.8日
地震的题目。第一段完完全全就是讲某老观点认为地震都是发生在浅层的。给出原因,还给出一个in addition,最近的major earthquakes都是发生在浅层的。然后第二段才开始讲也有很多地震发生在深层。某个British的科学家就给出了两个假设,反正都会导致石头crystal structure的变化(这个有考点),但是第一种呢发生的比较缓慢所以不会导致地震,第二种就会导致地震。

V8  【by: loverwy  780】11.10日
原文讲的很清楚了,只写问题。
(1) 第二段是什么作用
答:我选的是提供exception of the theory mentioned in the first passage。
(2) 那2个mechanism(一个是phase transformation, 一个是M开头的transformation)的比较
答:选他们都摧残了crystal structure。
(3) 还考了主题题
答:possible explanation to a scientific puzzle

V9  【by: 诺凌诺然  及老公】11.10日晚
题目
1 主旨 explain a scientific puzzle
2 第二段作用 exception...
3 change structure

V10  【by: pureme831216  770】11.16日
题目
1 第二段高亮 问作用: 应该是 exception of the theory mentions in the first passage 选项E比较迷惑,是说什么definition,个人认为不对
2.关于P和S型地震,下面哪个对:选都改变晶体结构。(原文提到了,只是P改变得慢,而S改变得很快)
3.主旨:解决了一个长久的科学疑团

考古中的考古
考古:demonada
V1   byfeiyang0707(700 Q51V32)
还有一篇讲地震的,一开始说大家认为地震不是发生在地表附近的,但观察发现很多都是在地表不远的。第二段讲很深的地方也有几百次地震,之类之类……我根本就没看懂这两段的逻辑关系,但是有考。
V2  Bytknicole
也碰到了地震的那道题
有问说main purpose是什么
还有一道是关于什么temperture和地震formation, level还有speed有关的细节题。

V3  byjessie1004(750)
earthquake里面有考到第二段里说到的两种方法共同点是什么,我貌似选的是E,有一个迷惑选项觉得不对,是说两个都说明earquake不早于400米以下发生,距离可能不对,但是文中第一段是说old idea earthquake都在surface发生,第二段开头只说发现了在200-400米,就是比较深的地方有earthquake,但是没说400以下就不会发生,大家考场在注意一下,还考了主题题,选的应该是解释了一个scientific puzzle???忘记了

V4  by1234567x(Q51 V39)
还有一篇短的是地震的
这篇有狗的话很容易,主旨题选对一个老观点提出新观点。就是第一段说原来认为只有浅层地震,第二段说也有深层地震。
还有一个题目问第二段的,某人提出的两种解释有什么特点,选两种解释都说了是crystal line structure改变(原文是解释1是那个被否的,因为develop慢;解释2是那个被接受的)

考古(已确认)  感谢口耐的忽然
V5
地震一般人认为地震发生在地表,但实际上有hundreds of地震发生在地球深处,然后解释可能的原因,先说了一种,但认为这个过程太慢,又说了一个最有可能的原因

V 6
一个就是OG11里面有的地震有浅层的,有深层发生的。但是注意不是原文,第一段一样,但是第二段完全不同。主要问了几个全局题,比如main purpose,我选的explain a scientific puzzle,不知道是否对。

V7
另一篇是地震的那个,第一段说地震一般发生在离地表很近的地方(30?不记得单位了),第二段说有一些发生在地下150-160,然后某科学家有2个说法(那两个词我都不认识,一个是p开头的,另一个是m开头的,好像)问题有一个问到了这两个说法的共同点,我选的是都认为是内部structure改变了(大概就是这个意思吧,具体的记不清了)

V8
淺層地震是100~150,而深層地震是150~400。第一段說淺層地震是一個general belief。第二段在refute這個general belief(這裡有考兩題喔,一題是第二段的function,一題是main idea,好好把握)。第二段主要講到一個學著提出說法,第一種transformation被否定因為develop的太慢,接著他又提出第二種說法,這種說法就可以解釋深層地震的發生,這裡有考一題就是比較兩種說法,答案應該是選兩種都會change crystalline structure那個

V9
一段说地震一般发生在离地表很近,大概30mile的地方,二段说有一些特别的发生在地下120-400mile,然后一个科学家列出了2个说法,第一个是P,给出了解释,不用担心不认识这个单词,但是这个P似乎解决不了啥问题,接着他又提出了另一种可能性M,也有解释。3个问题。有一个问到了这两个说法的共同点,
都改变了一种什么东西(似乎是一种石头)的structure. 第二个是主体题。

背景文
Most parts of the world experience at least occasional shallow earthquakes—those that originate within 40 miles of the Earth’s outer surface. In fact, the great majority of earthquake foci are shallow. It should be noted, however, that the geographic distribution of smaller earthquakes is less completely determined than more severe quakes, partly because the availability of relevant data is dependent on the distribution of observatories.
Of the total energy released in earthquakes, 12 percent comes from intermediate earthquakes—that is, quakes with a focal depth ranging from about 60 to 300 km. About 3 percent of total energy comes from deeper earthquakes. The frequency of occurrence falls off rapidly with increasing focal depth in the intermediate range.  
The deeper-focus earthquakes commonly occur in patterns called Benioff zones that dip into the Earth, indicating the presence of a subducting slab. Benioff zones coincide with tectonically active island arcs such as Japan, Vanuatu, Tonga, and the Aleutians, and they are normally but not always associated with deep ocean trenches such as those along the South American Andes. Exceptions to this rule include Romania and the Hindu Kush mountain system. In most Benioff zones, intermediate- and deep-earthquake foci lie in a narrow layer, although recent precise hypocentral locations in Japan and elsewhere show two distinct parallel bands of foci 20 km apart.

TOP

*2.1.3 有害植物
By chenr523
阅读有一篇是说一种有害植物吧dodder的 种子到处传播的 说是它能够好像有感觉一样能认到有tomato prefume的东西。。还有impatiens也和tomato有类似作用

考古
【未确认】
考古 by syangg
寄生(F15) 注意题目有变(12.1)
Version 1: 一个说的是dodder, 第一段说的它是怎么把种子撒在植物的树干里,然后怎么缠住植物导致植物死亡的。二段说西红柿地因为它减产。发现西红柿有个什么吸引它的种子。(反正说它难解决)三段好像发现一个什么可以解决这个问题。问题有一个是dodder是怎么影响西红柿的。

Version 2: 前面的机经上提到过的,关于一种植物,寄生在其他植物上面,如果它萌发以后在一周内没有找到寄主,就会死掉。它们的寄生,给西红柿的种植带来很大损失。然后研究人员就研究是什么原因导致此植物在萌发的时候能发现西红柿秧子。首先他们用一块潮湿的空地,发现这种植物不为所动。然后就在地里放上五颜六色的东西(好像是这个吧,不是关键,没仔细看),这个植物还是不为所动。最后研究人员发现,这个植物似乎长了“鼻子”,它可以闻到西红柿样子的气味,他们把这个植物放到西红柿地旁边,它就被吸引过去了。研究人员继续研究,从西红柿的气味中发现了7种成分,其中有3种成分对此植物有吸引力。然后在小麦的气味中也发现了同样的成分,但是小麦还含有一种成分,可以阻止这个植物的寄生,所以就成为以后帮助西红柿秧子遏制此寄生植物的思路。
问题1是,以下那个是正确的:我选择的是:这个寄生植物如果一周找不到寄主就会死亡。问题2是,文章的主旨,我选择的是:介绍了一种新的方法吧(不好意思,这个记不清楚了。不敢误导,但是肯定是关于新的什么东东的)

问题3是,这个寄生植物是怎么影响西红柿的,我的选择是:ROB西红丝的水分


Version 3:一个说的是dodder, 第一段说的它是一定要在一个星期内找到寄主,不然会死。又说一般它的寄主最后都会死(有题,那个must be true,里面有个选项,dodder will eventually kill the plant)。它还引起了某年西红柿的收成损失xxx(一个数目或者比例)。第二段说作相关的研究,开始种在一片地方,放其他植物在旁边,它不会倍吸引过去。然后放放西红柿就倍吸引过去了。然后研究人员在西红柿研究出了7种香素,这些香素有几种在wheat中也有,但是wheat中还有一种抑制dodder的香素。最后一段我忘了说什么了。有一道题目是问第二段中说了些什么。选项中有个选项是出现在第一段的,一个说dodder需要在一个星期内找到寄主,不然会死去。正确的选项应该是wheat中有一种抑制dodder的香素。


Version 4:第一段:講一種植物(dodder)根很淺,因為他把所有的能量都拿來長他的shoot,然後要在一星期內找到寄生主因此影響農作物生長,最後一句話是,他會影響pomato的產量
第二段:科學家好像要嘗試找出為什麼dodder有這種特性,參考下文
At first, the researchers set various possible targets several centimeters from dodder sprouts. A pot of moist soil alone didn't attract the seedlings, nor did vials of dyed water that created colored light. But a pot with a young tomato plant, and even a cup of perfume made of tomato volatiles, did attract the seedlings
我記得最後一句是..... dodder grows toward impatiens and tomatoes, but not wheat.
Q:問整個第三段的功能(整個第三段反黃):有兩個選項很像A:針對前面講到的題出一個conclusion 另一個:.....findings 我好像選這個這題很不確定大家要在判斷一下
第三段:整段就在解釋為什麼wheat不會attract dodder,科學家分析tomato中有7種perfume其中有四種會吸引dodder,wheat也有其中一種,但是wheat也有一種東西會repel dodder,因此提供了一種可以防治dodder的想法
When researchers tested seven ingredients in the tomato perfume individually, three of them proved attractive to the dodder. One of those attractants showed up in wheat, but the wheat perfume also contained a substance that repelled the seedlings. Such a repellent might offer a new route for fighting dodder
Q:忘了題目講啥,ans好像是提供一種可以防治dodder的方法

背景文

参考文章:(我根据JJ里的信息稍微的关注了一下,供参考)
Scent Stalking: Parasitic vine grows toward tomato odor

Susan Milius

A wiry orange vine finds plants to raid for nutrients by growing toward their smell, researchers report.

One of the parasitic plants called dodders responds to volatile compounds wafting off nearby plants and shows preferences for certain species, says Consuelo De Moraes of Pennsylvania State University in University Park. They say that their new work marks the first time that anyone has shown that a plant will grow toward airborne chemicals from other plants.

The experiment finally identifies a cue—scent—that draws dodder to its victims, adds Mark C. Mescher, also of Penn State
.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture lists dodder among the country's 10 worst weeds. When a dodder seed sprouts, it doesn't grow roots. All its energy goes into a tendril that shoots out in search of plants to tap for water and nutrients. If it's going to survive, it must latch on to a victim within about a week. The vine grows into a spaghetti tangle and can attack multiple plants, stunting their growth but not killing them.

Of the 150 species of dodder, the researchers selected Cuscuta pentagona, says coauthor Justin Runyon, also of Penn State. This species bedevils tomato growers in California, where it costs them an estimated $4 million a year in reduced yields.
De Moraes' team and other researchers have studied the volatile compounds released by plants that are mauled by caterpillars or other pests. In the new study, reported in the Sept. 29 Science, the team took a different point of view, looking at how an attacker, the dodder, takes advantage of volatiles to target its prey.

At first, the researchers set various possible targets several centimeters from dodder sprouts. A pot of moist soil alone didn't attract the seedlings, nor did vials of dyed water that created colored light.But a pot with a young tomato plant, and even a cup of perfume made of tomato volatiles, did attract the seedlings

To minimize any confounding cues, such as shading or light, the researchers then set the possible attractants in chambers connected to the plant by curving pipes. Again, the seedlings grew toward the scent.

Testing various victim species, the researchers found that dodder grows toward impatiens and tomatoes.Wheat won't sustain dodder well, and given a choice, parasite seedlings shunned it and grew toward tomatoes.

When researchers tested seven ingredients in the tomato perfume individually, three of them proved attractive to the dodder. One of those attractants showed up in wheat, but the wheat perfume also contained a substance that repelled the seedlings. Such a repellent might offer a new route for fighting dodder, Mescher speculates.

An insect ecologist who has also studied plant volatiles, Rick Karban of the University of California, Davis comments, "The significance of this [study] to me is that it indicates that without a central nervous system, plants are capable of behaving in ways that appear fairly sophisticated."

-大家说这篇非原文~不过可做作为背景文来看~
第一篇【大意就差不多了】
Dodder is a wiry, orange vine that steals water and nutrients from other plants. Scientists have now found that this vine chooses its victim by smell, growing its shoots in the direction of a plant's natural perfume. A seedling of a vine known as dodder attaches to a tomato plant.
When a dodder seed sprouts, it doesn't grow roots to seek its own food. Instead, it grows a shoot that reaches out to other plants, tapping them for food. The baby vine needs to find a host within a week to survive. It then grows into a spaghetti tangle that can even ensnare more than one plant.
Also known as strangleweed and witches' shoelaces, dodders are listed among the 10 worst weeds in the United States. They can cost farmers millions of dollars by stunting their crops.
To figure out how a type of dodder vine known to prefer tomato plants finds a victim, scientists placed dodder sprouts near several possible targets. These targets included pots of moist soil, little jars of dyed water that created colored lights, young tomato plants, and even a cup of perfume made from chemicals that tomato plants give off.
Seedlings grew toward the tomato plant. They also reached out toward the cup of tomato perfume. They tended not to grow toward the moist soil or colored water.
The scientists then used a different setup, hiding the targets in chambers connected to dodder sprouts only by curving pipes, so the vine could find them only by smell. Dodder sprouts still grew toward their favored targets.
By placing dodder sprouts near different plants, the scientists found that the type of dodder that they were studying prefers tomatoes and a flower called impatiens. And when given a choice between tomato and wheat, vine seedlings grow toward tomato.
The researchers then tested seven of the ingredients that make up tomato perfume separately. Dodder sprouts were attracted to three of them.
One of these ingredients turns up in wheat perfume, but the wheat perfume also contains a substance that repels dodder sprouts. This chemical could offer farmers one way to fight the vine and save their crops.—C. Gramling

第二篇【据说原文比这简单点,实验内容什么的描述的很简单】
One of the parasitic plants called dodders responds to volatile compounds wafting off nearby plants and shows preferences for certain species, says Consuelo De Moraes of Pennsylvania State University in University Park. They say that their new work marks the first time that anyone has shown that a plant will grow toward airborne chemicals from other plants.
The experiment finally identifies a cue—scent—that draws dodder to its victims, adds Mark C. Mescher, also of Penn State.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture lists dodder among the country's 10 worst weeds. When a dodder seed sprouts, it doesn't grow roots. All its energy goes into a tendril that shoots out in search of plants to tap for water and nutrients. If it's going to survive, it must latch on to a victim within about a week. The vine grows into a spaghetti tangle and can attack multiple plants, stunting their growth but not killing them.
Of the 150 species of dodder, the researchers selected Cuscuta pentagona, says coauthor Justin Runyon, also of Penn State. This species bedevils tomato growers in California, where it costs them an estimated $4 million a year in reduced yields.
De Moraes' team and other researchers have studied the volatile compounds released by plants that are mauled by caterpillars or other pests. In the new study, reported in the Sept. 29 Science, the team took a different point of view, looking at how an attacker, the dodder, takes advantage of volatiles to target its prey.
At first, the researchers set various possible targets several centimeters from dodder sprouts. A pot of moist soil alone didn't attract the seedlings, nor did vials of dyed water that created colored light. But a pot with a young tomato plant, and even a cup of perfume made of tomato volatiles, did attract the seedlings (see movie at http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060930/tomato.mov).
To minimize any confounding cues, such as shading or light, the researchers then set the possible attractants in chambers connected to the plant by curving pipes. Again, the seedlings grew toward the scent.
Testing various victim species, the researchers found that dodder grows toward impatiens and tomatoes. Wheat won't sustain dodder well, and given a choice, parasite seedlings shunned it and grew toward tomatoes.
When researchers tested seven ingredients in the tomato perfume individually, three of them proved attractive to the dodder. One of those attractants showed up in wheat, but the wheat perfume also contained a substance that repelled the seedlings. Such a repellent might offer a new route for fighting dodder, Mescher speculates.
An insect ecologist who has also studied plant volatiles, Rick Karban of the University of California, Davis comments, "The significance of this [study] to me is that it indicates that without a central nervous system, plants are capable of behaving in ways that appear fairly sophisticated."

TOP

*2.1.4 冷血动物
V1 By luckyxmx
记起来那个长阅读了,好像是三四段,第一段说冷血动物(还是冬眠动物)为什么能够活在很冷的天气里而不死。因为它们有某种物质,这种物质可以阻止小冰晶结成大冰晶破坏组织什么的。比较长
第二段举了某动物的例子,说它还有另外一种物质帮助它在寒冷环境下存活,这种物质帮它减低细胞能量的消耗什么的,这段比较短
第三段说了这个原理在医学上的应用,墨迹了一会,但好像目前为止还没成功的样子。。。这段比上一段长一点点

V2 By 某贝
冷血动物靠什么机制过冬。说了2种方法。第二种方法还单独一断用wood frog举例来说。最后是说可以把这些方法运用到人的器官移植。。觉得这篇是最简单的。。记得比较清楚

V3 by njim
还有就是有一篇冷血动物怎么通过不同方法冬眠,而人们还无法这种应用到器官医学方面

V4 by syusuke02
树蛙整段高亮问作用

考古
冷血动物体内结晶
【已确认】
V1 by mopton(690)
1篇讲某些冷血动物(会冬眠的乌龟,青蛙。。)体内的ice-nucleating(冰晶)?(1段)帮助细胞crystalized,另外的anti-freezing帮助减少the cluster of crystalization。(2段)青蛙体内有种XX(忘了名字)帮助reduce energy needed for metabolism。(3段)医学应用。(4段)虽然这篇是比较长第三段,但很容易读懂。

V2 by yifeifan (700)
一篇长阅读,像托福的:冷血动物poikilotherm的一些用于防治自身被freeze的functions,题目都是原文能直接定位的。中间一段举了树蛙的例子,它和上文中提到的那些动物的functions不同,有问题

V3 by rayzero
动物过冬的那个 freeze crystal的题目 补充一下中间那段说树蛙的,他说树蛙是通过增加血液里的血糖来过冬的。(后面有到细节题问的是这里树蛙增加血糖的作用)。

V4 by angelfisher
我能补充的就是第二段它讲的是crystalized什么的原理,然后就说这个晶体会越来越大,所以就有antifreezing来帮助减少,这里有个考点。第三段讲wood frog好像跟前文说的那个不太一样,第三段不长,但是有两个考题。第四段是医学应用,很简单,没考点。

V5 by withtea (690)
冬眠动物体内结晶那篇。文章有点长但是细节题很多,定位很容易。

V6 by zhouchlcy
防冻的那篇,就记得第三段吧,讲一种青蛙能提高血糖浓度,延缓被冻
有两道题,一个是全段高亮,问这段的作用
一个是问这种青蛙的防冻跟上面讲的有什么不同

V7 by Johnnyli (750)
冷血动物结晶,记得好像有个问题都是关于某个anti-freeze proteide的作用,原文中说它可以控制体内冰块结晶的体积保持在小冰渣的状态,不会凝结成大块(大概是这个意思),答案是控制...某个词忘了

V8 by 加洛林 (710)
树蛙的那个:有一个问说作者提到这种树蛙是为了什么?定位树蛙例子上段结尾。还有问没有树蛙体内的那种腺体物质,树蛙会怎样?仔细理解那个腺体的作用很重要。我选了一个能量所需无法满足。还有一个问说一种t物质实干什么用的?选保持血液中冰晶结冻速率稳定那个。还有一个问题在结尾,问你科学家研究的一个物质有什么特性。

背景文
Freeze tolerance
The ability to withstand the long-term freezing of body fluids has developed in diverse groups of animals
including some frogs and turtles, many types of insects, and a variety of intertidal marine molluscs and
barnacles (Storey and Storey, 1989, 1996). Freeze tolerance occurs in several species of woodland frogs
that hibernate in the leaf litter of the forest floor including the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) (Figure 3), the
gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor), the spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer) and the chorus frog (Pseudacris
triseriata). The Siberian salamander (Salamandrella keyserlingii) and two turtle species, the terrestrial box
turtle (Terrapene carolina) and the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) also survive freezing. Freeze tolerance
by painted turtles is limited to the newly hatched juveniles that stay in their underground nests for their first
winter of life whereas the adults winter under water.
The driving force for freeze tolerance was probably an inability to mount an effective defense
against inoculative freezing by environmental ice. For example, the water-permeable skin of frogs is no
barrier to ice propagation and although frogs chilled to -2°C may stay supercooled if they are sitting on a
dry substrate, they begin to freeze in less than 30 seconds if they touch ice crystals. Since frogs need to
hibernate in the humid the leaf litter to keep from desiccating, they have virtually no chance of avoiding
freezing if ice penetrates into their microenvironment.
Freezing can cause multiple types of damage to unprotected organisms (Figure 4). Ice formation
inside of cells scrambles intracellular architecture and is lethal in virtually all instances so even freeze
tolerant animals take precautions to limit ice formation to extracellular spaces. Extracellular ice can also do
physical damage by squeezing or shearing cells, puncturing membranes or bursting microcapillaries so that
upon thawing, the integrity of cells and organs is destroyed. Ice propagating through extracellular spaces
such as the abdominal cavity, blood stream, gut lumen and bladder also causes severe dehydration of cells.
This is because the formation of ice, which is a crystal of pure water, excludes the solutes that were
dissolved in it and raises the concentration of the remaining unfrozen extracellular fluid. This highly
concentrated fluid puts an osmotic stress on cells and draws water out of them so that they shrink in
volume. If shrinkage exceeds a critical minimum cell volume, irreversible damage is done to the lipid
membranes surrounding the cell and the cells are not viable after thawing. Freezing of blood also halts the
delivery of oxygen and nutrients to organs which most organisms cannot tolerate for long.
Freeze tolerant animals have developed defenses against these possible injuries with adaptations
that fall into several categories: (1) regulation of ice propagation through body tissues, (2) damage repair to
deal with bleeding injuries caused by ice, (3) minimizing cell volume reduction during freezing, (4)
membrane and protein stabilization, (5) resistance to oxygen deprivation, and (6) reactivation of vital signs
(breathing, heart beat, nerve and muscle activity) after thawing (Storey and Storey, 1996).
To control ice formation, freeze tolerant animals use specific nucleators (Figure 4). Instead of
lowering their SCP in winter as freeze avoiding animals do, freeze tolerant animals raise their SCP by using
nucleators so that freezing occurs begins just below the FP. Some species introduce special ice nucleating
proteins into their blood whereas others use contact with environmental ice crystals or the presence of
nucleating bacteria on the skin or in the gut to stimulate ice formation. The slow freeze initiated by
nucleators allows the greatest possible time for organs to make metabolic adjustments before blood
circulation halts and permits a controlled dehydration of organs that sequesters most of the ice in extraorgan
spaces (such as the abdominal cavity). This reduces the chance of internal damage to organs such as
by ice expansion within the lumen of capillaries. Some freeze tolerant animals also appear to have AFPs in
their body fluids which seems contradictory. However, it appears that the function of AFPs in freeze
tolerant systems is to help regulate crystal growth and inhibit recrystallization, the process whereby small
crystals regroup over time into larger crystals. In addition, freeze tolerant animals enhance their damage
repair mechanisms so that bleeding injuries can be dealt with rapidly upon thawing. In wood frogs, for
example, freezing stimulates the production of blood clotting proteins.
Controlled dehydration of cells and organs can minimize ice damage but cell volume reduction
can only go so far before cell membranes collapse under compression stress. Generally, freeze tolerant
animals can endure the conversion of up to ~65% of their total body water into extracellular ice but the
remainder must remain liquid within cells. Water retention in cells is aided by the synthesis of high levels
of glycerol or related carbohydrates which provide the same protection to the intracellular milieu of freeze
tolerant animals that they do for all of the body water of freeze avoiding animals. Frogs use glucose as their
cryoprotectant with levels of this blood sugar rising by 50-100 fold or more whenever body fluids begin to
freeze (Storey and Storey, 1996) . Interestingly, frogs show no evidence of the debilitating effects of
hyperglycemia that are evident at much lower sugar levels (2-10 fold above normal) in diabetics. Other
cryoprotectants are also produced that stabilize the structure of cell membranes so that they can resist
compression stress; the sugar, trehalose, and the amino acid, proline, are widely used for this function.
They intercalate between the headgroups of membrane phospholipids to stabilize the bilayer structure that
is key to biological function and prevent the lipids from collapsing into an amorphous gel.
Freeze tolerant animals have also enhanced their ability to cope with oxygen deprivation for there
is no breathing and no blood circulation while frozen. Again, high glycogen reserves are used to produce
ATP energy via glycolysis with lactate build-up tolerated during the freeze. Freeze tolerant animals also
show enhanced antioxidant defenses that can minimize damage due to the production of oxygen free
radicals when breathing resumes after thawing. The molecular mechanisms that reactivate vital signs
during thawing are still largely unexplored. In frogs, a resumption of heart beat is the first detectable vital
sign, followed soon thereafter by breathing and later by a return of coordinated muscle movements. Studies
of the physiology and biochemistry of natural freezing survival by frogs are revealing numerous secrets that
are being applied in the development of improved cryopreservation technology for the freezing storage of
mammalian cells, tissues and organs.

TOP

*2.1.5 月球岩石
By TorresHu
月球上的岩石样本, 阿波罗计划,还有关键词simulator, JXX-13(XX表示忘了具体内容)

考古         阿波罗登月
【已确认】
V1by  DoraZhao
一个关于lunar 啥啥的研究。
V2by  myc_815
第一段,当阿波罗飞船从月球取回土壤样本时大家都认为月球表面smooth, airless,似乎很安详,但其实环境很恶略,好像总是下细小的颗粒雨把地面弄的坑坑洼洼
第二段,有点忘了,好像说科学家研究这些小颗粒富含许多物质可以当作资源使用。最后一句说有些dust对机器对人有害,人会吸入肺中。(有考题)
第三段,忘了。
V3by   zephyruswong
阿波罗探月,这个没读明白。不记得了。。大概就是取月亮上的东西做实验。。
V4by   Dreamsgirl
一篇考的是Appollo计划,挺长的,一屏多
V5by   gtagta(720)
一篇是月球的。大概是讲月球表面的物质构成的,然后科学家根据月球探测器带回来的sample想在地球上模拟一个类似的环境,最终目的是人类能在月球上生活。
V6by  zengwj   
第一篇:关于月球的(长度:一屏半)
美国阿波罗号探访月球,发现月球上面的小圆点原来都是一个个很大的坑。月球上有一种沙尘暴(按照文章的理解应该是类似与沙尘暴的东西),里面的小颗粒对机器,人都会有损害。(文章会问道这种颗粒有什么特征,阅读的时候注意一下)
阿波罗号回来后,科学家根据月球探测器带回来的sample想在地球上模拟一个类似的环境,模拟的材料出了来自美国,当然还来自国际。(有问题问到模拟器中物质的问题,我选这种物质不是所有的都是来自美国的选项,不知道对不对。答案在第二段)
V7by  didiflute
第一段讲以前认为月球很平坦,但是现在发现月球上有很多坑,然后说月球表面的什么土什么的对机器有损害,对人的肺也是。(后面有考题,问说如果不是宇航员上月球而是用机器人,那么下面那个是正确的:基本确认,选择说如果机器人能够避免月球表面的对metal的腐蚀那么这个计划就是顺利的。总之是有个unless的选项,大概是C吧)
第二段是讲到了APOLO阿波罗号带回来的什么样本,然后科学家只有simulate模拟这种月球的土质才能以后在月球上built观测点开发月球。(这里有题,好象是infer题吧,大概是选科学家只有运用这种simulant(这词我不太懂,约摸是对土质的模拟的意思吧)才能够进行试验)。然后说现在能够模拟出那些那些方面的regional 土质来了。一大堆细节,不重要。
这篇考到的话要好好看哈,反正挺烦的。。。拖我时间了的。
然后第三段不太重要。
V8by  jjj_kkk_kkk(760 V41)
第一段,lunar rock sample有suprising results-很晦涩的一段,地理名词太多。幸好考点不多第二段 现实的lunar sample太少,不足以做研究(考点,细节)。
第三段 US在Arizona用火山岩仿照lunar rock。只仿造3种最基本的--有题,问原因,原因是造所有的成本太高。
V9by  kidyrain  (730)
lunar带回来的sample那篇,有一道问题是infer题,问可以从lunar带回来的sample中知道什么,开始的时候看了很久,后来恍然大悟应该选A,但选项忘了
V10by  zl_summer
说阿波罗从月球带回了一些sample,科学家研究表明以前观点不对,事实上它的表面有很多***(不记得了)然后这类研究就不流行了,知道某些科学家发现研究还是有意义的,于是合成了某三个物质去某一月球,但是由于月球表面各地是复杂的,所以很难推,尽管如此,模拟的材料还是取得了成功,这些东西的原材料来自世界各地(有一题就是关于这个的)。
V11by amumu
(1)suggest题,要一个个排除
(2)寂静题:就是不是所有都来自美国那个。
(3)主题题:选择的是explain context ...
V12by Saixss(740 V39)
我出到了一个题目问关于那个material,仔细看过了,应该是选不是来自美国的一个地方的那个选项。。
又考到关于那个regolith,这里是重点好好看。。问这个agglutinates有什么特点。。我好像选的是被GLASS包围的那一项。。还有什么IRON含量很高,或者是来自regolith。。
V13by zowenny (V27)
题目第一题是inffer  我选的是 月球上的环境会导致mental 的设备坏掉    还有一题问你 关于从月球上取回来的sample  我选的 是他们只对那些研究AISm之类的一个项目的科学家available    有一题问 如果用机器人探月的话要成功则  选哪个only if  寂静里的那个答案是对的
V14by yiluqiming
就是问关于那个lunar sample的问以下哪个是正确的?我选的是那个lunar sample 几乎包含了major 月球的成分,还有答案是说sample里有月球上带来的火山岩,这是错的,因为原文指明了此火山岩是从在Arizona in US 那里拿来的
V15by leeyuan1(700)
完全一样 顺序小不同,略删节,文字句式内容和他里面分析的题目也一样
V16by  winner2010(690 V35)
这篇有个题目很搞的,问到那个regolith,大家好好看看吧.我觉得是二三段里定位…
V17by  gerrard(710 V36)
第一段讲以前认为月球很平坦,美国阿波罗号探访月球,发现月球上面的小圆点原来都是一个个很大的坑。月球上有一种沙尘暴(按照文章的理解应该是类似与沙尘暴的东西),里面的小颗粒对机器,对人都有害,人会吸入肺中。
Q1:问说如果不是宇航员上月球而是用机器人,那么下面那个是正确的:基本确认,选择说如果机器人能够避免月球表面的对metal的腐蚀那么这个计划就是顺利的。总之是有个unless的选项,大概是C吧)
第二段是讲到了APOLO阿波罗号带回来的什么样本,现实的lunar sample太少,不足以做研究。然后科学家只有simulate模拟这种月球的土质才能以后在月球上built观测点开发月球。模拟的材料出了来自美国,当然还来自国际。
Q2:问模拟器中物质的问题,我选这种物质不是所有的都是来自美国的选项,答案在第二段(730)
Q3:infer题:问可以从lunar带回来的sample中知道什么,选A,大概是选科学家只有运用这种simulate才能够进行试验。
Q4.第三段 US在Arizona用火山岩仿照lunar rock。只仿造3种最基本的--有题,问原因,原因是造所有的成本太高。
背景资料 感谢jjj_kkk_kkk提供(其实内容不太一样,但是好多生词是一样的。熟悉一下词汇就好。)

背景文
http://science.nasa.gov/science- ... 006/28dec_truefake/
Life is tough for a humble grain of dirt on the surface of the Moon. It's peppered with cosmic rays, exposed to solar flares, and battered by micrometeorites--shattered, vaporized and re-condensed countless times over the billions of years. Adding insult to injury, Earthlings want to strip it down to oxygen and other elements for "in situ resource utilization," or ISRU, the process of living off the land when NASA returns to the Moon in the not-so-distant future.
But, as Robert Heinlein famously observed, "the Moon is a harsh mistress." Living with moondust and striping it down may be trickier than anyone supposes.
Right: A speck of Moon dirt. The strange shape tells a tale of violence: It results from the welding of rock, mineral and glass by the heat of micrometeoroid impacts. Image credit: David S. McKay, NASA/JSC.
To find out how tricky, researchers would like to test their ideas for ISRU and their designs for lunar rovers on real lunar soil before astronauts return to the Moon. But there's a problem:
"We don't have enough real moondust to go around," says Larry Taylor, director of Planetary Geosciences Institute at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. To run all the tests, "we need to make a well-qualified lunar simulant." And not just a few bags will do. "We need tons of it, mainly for working on technologies for diggers and wheels and machinery on the surface," adds David S. McKay, chief scientist for astrobiology at the Johnson Space Center (JSC).

Taylor and McKay are lead members of a small group of self-styled "lunatics" whose careers have focused on lunar soil and rocks. They are among several consultants to NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), which manages the Lunar Regolith Simulant Development Program.
Carole McLemore is the program manager at Marshall. Back in the 1990s, she explains, researchers used a lunar simulant called JSC-1 developed at JSC. But "there is no more JSC-1 available." So, to get started, researchers at Marshall are working with the Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science office at Johnson to create a replica of the JSC-1 simulant: JSC-1A. It comes in three types based on grain size (fine, medium and coarse). MSFC has also begun work on more demanding simulants representing various locations on the Moon.
Until the Apollo astronauts brought lunar soil samples to Earth during 1969-72, the belief was that the Moon's dry, airless environment left the soil largely undisturbed. Reality is much harsher.
Micrometeorites, many smaller than a pencil point, constantly rain onto the surface at up to 100,000 km/hr (about 62,000 mph), chipping off materials or forming microscopic impact craters. Some melt the soil and vaporize and re-condense as glassy coats on other specks of dust. Impacts weld debris into "agglutinates." Complicated interactions with the solar wind convert iron in the soil into myriads of "nano-phase" metallic iron grains just a few nanometers wide.

Above: The lunar surface is exposed to solar wind and constantly pounded by micrometeorites. Credit: Larry Taylor, Univ. of Tennessee.
These processes form the "regolith" -- Greek for stone blanket (litho + rhegos) -- covering the Moon's surface. What greets astronauts and spaceships is a complex material comprising "sharp, abrasive, interlocking fragile glass shards and fragments," Taylor says. It grinds machinery and seals, and damages human lungs.
"Some of the stuff that got into the Apollo spacecraft was very finely ground," McKay said. Dust was everywhere and impossible to brush off. All the lunar astronauts had lung reactions to this dust, some more than others, like Harrison H. (Jack) Schmitt's "lunar dust hay fever."
The Apollo specimens are America's Crown Jewels and are doled out in ultra-small samples to scientists who can demonstrate that nothing else will do for high-value experiments. Renewed interest in lunar exploration in the late 1980s meant that lunar simulants were needed to test schemes for building structures on the Moon or for extracting oxygen and other materials.
That led to JSC-1 in 1993, made of basaltic volcanic cinder cone deposits from a quarry near Flagstaff, AZ. The 25-ton lot -- distributed in 50-pound bags -- proved popular.
"We're totally out, but that's soon to be corrected," said McKay. MSFC has a Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) contract with Orbitec of Madison, WI, to manufacture about 16 metric tonnes of three types of JSC-1A: 1 tonne of fines (delivered); 14 tonnes of moderate grains (being delivered); and 1 tonne of coarse grains (coming soon). The U.S. Geological Survey in Denver and the University of Colorado at Boulder -- key partners -- are checking the chemical, mineralogical, and geotechnical properties.
Right: This photomicrograph of soil from a lunar mare hints at the underlying variety of genuine Moon dirt and the difficulty of reproducing it.
MSFC is developing three new simulants. Two will represent mare and polar highlands regions. A third will represent the glassy, sharp, jagged edges of regolith that test the best of hardware and humans. But matching every location on the Moon would require large numbers of small, unique, expensive batches.
"Instead, we will develop root simulants and manufacture specific simulants from these, but also enable investigators to enhance the products as needed," McLemore added. "I liken this process to baking a cake: depending on the type of cake you want, you need certain ingredients for it to come out right and taste right. Getting the recipe right whether for a cake or lunar simulants is critical."
For example, the new mare simulant will be enriched with ilmenite, a crystalline iron-titanium oxide. Source materials used to produce the three simulants will potentially come from locations as diverse as Montana, Arizona, Virginia, Florida, Hawaii, and even some international sites.
Initial lots will weigh just tens of pounds to ensure that the simulant is made correctly. "Eventually we will scale up to larger quantities when we can make sure that there is little variation from batch to batch," McLemore said.
Once NASA understands how to make the various simulants, plans are to farm the work out to companies to produce larger batches. "We will have certification procedures in place for vendors to follow so users know that the simulants meet the NASA standards," McLemore said.
And that will be the best way to tell it's a "true fake." Accept no substitutes.

TOP

*2.1.6 引进消失动物
V1 By 出方告
第一段观点:一些convention生物学家认为北美洲曾经消失的那些大型动物应该被引进,之后的两段说了原因:因为可以控制食草动物繁殖过快,可以为其他动物创造良好的生存环境,可以因生态旅行而获利。还举了一个委内瑞拉发洪水导致环境被隔绝生态被破坏的例子。最后一段反驳一些人的说法。这些人说现在环境和以前不一样了不适合大型动物了,还应该验一下dna啥的,作者回呛说现在啥都和以前一样就是没有大动物了。。这里有出观点,问作者啥态度,显然是支持生物学家的。

V2 By sweetwade
讲一种动物(大型的,应该和大象有关系)对生态系统的影响~~
大型动物的应该是这个,能否回忆一下呢?

V3 by yanjunyi
有关于引进濒危动物的那个阅读。第一段就大概介绍了一下引进动物的观点。之后都是说的这个引进濒危动物的难处和不可操作性。所以有个主旨题在这里。每个段落也都有细节题。第二段有个evaluation题。问用了xx动物的例子,为的是阐述一个什么观点。(大概意思就是说,要如何确定谁是要被保护的对象是有难度的。) 第三段说的什么忘了,反正也是反驳的。第四段是说动物的分类也给引进动物带来了难点什么的。总体来说,文章有点长,但是不是很难。

考古
【已确认】
2.2.2大型动物
V1 by leila413
大型动物近年在北美灭绝,可能进化成了相同的小型动物,保守的生态学家想引进大型动物环境变化可能是原因 大型动物对平衡生态好,控制是草类动物数量一些反对的人人为这会破坏当地生态,因为大型动物是外来物种,可是作者认为不会的,因为这些大型动物和北美本地的物种有相同的基因

V2 by cutetiger555
建议引进大型动物,因为会对生态有好处 (超长)
细节题:专家最可能在proposal中plan什么:我选E,不肯定对
A是?
B是fencing off 什么植物
C是做大型动物的DNA测试
D是plant什么什么,记不清了
E是创造长期经济效益
inference题:引进可能改进哪方面?
我选了WOODY植物的一项。在文章里提了

V3 by ttzztt
生物学家提议引入大型非洲(怎么又是非洲 )动物,健全生态系统,接着是可行性探讨,从生态系统本身,经济性以及引入动物的生存可能性等方面进行的讨论,总体观点是支持

考古by rebecca_wang(已确认)
V1
P1: 建议引进大型动物,因为会对生态有好处。(由于某些原因在美洲的一些大型动物灭绝了,但是其他地方还有,就想引进他们改善恶化的生态系统)
P2: 引进的好处(主要是举目前生态环境的现况,比如small 动物多什么的,已经了就会减低他们,切大象推倒一些树木对一些小动物居住有益)
P3:引进的好处,具体很多动物的例子(elephant lion)有 一道考题问下面什么动物的引进会带来经济 benefits (而不是生态benefits)我用了5分钟也没找到这个经济benefits。大家看到经济的要注意了。也可能不在这一段。
P4:有人要反对了。(说以前的大型动物和现在的不像,现在的不能在这住。支持者就说根据DNA检验,可以啊(有结构题,问DNA出现的作用——就是证明它们可以在这生活; 又有人反对说现在和以前环境不一样了啊,支持者又说了(忘了)

V2
第一段,环境保护学家建议复活古代大型生物,说这样对现在的ECO SYSTEM很有好处。
2段, 举例非洲,说非洲的生态比较完善,因为物种之间达到了一种平衡。
3段, 说引进这种大型动物会给北美现在的生态带来哪些好处。 最后还说了还有经济上的好处,而且COST不高,只需要让那些大型动物在保护区内闲逛,就可以吸引很多观光客。
4段, 说引进大型生物带来的问题。可能没有环境保护学家想的那么乐观。
问题:
1.作用题:第一段起到什么作用,我选了专家提出proposal和给出背景知识
2.细节题:(定位第二段)专家最可能在proposal中plan什么:我选C,不肯定对,但跟文章最相关
A是提供大型动物居住地
B是fencing off 什么植物
C是做大型动物的DNA测试
D是plant什么什么,记不清了
E是创造长期经济效益
3.细节题:(定位第二段)说北美缺少那个动物(M开头的一个词),最有可能引起的什么效果?我选的是引起fragmentECOSYSTEM什么什么,大意是说ECOSYSTEM不完整之类的。其他选项都是比较具体的,比如说狼怎么怎么了,狮子怎么怎么了之类的。
4.主题题:Main idea ofthe passage,我选的是评估专家的一个proposal。其他选项都是比较具体:比如是否应该引进M这个动物之类的。
5.说DNA检测有什么用:用途是说明引入大型动物是可行的,因为DNA检测说明什么各个洲的动物都差不多,所以不存在不同地方的动物有差异,造成引进可能失败的说法是不对的。
6.引入大型动物的好处,原来的jj说可能选和植物有关,是对的,对应原文说过度放牧,所以大型动物引过来,可以吃点草食动物,选这个。
7. 以下哪种动物对生态又改进:以前的jj说选大象和狼,我一开始想都没想就选了,后来一看时间挺富裕的,(因为前面语法没有犹豫)就又看了一眼,这一眼还真看出问题啦,因为文章在第一段单独提到了狼,在第二段同时提到了大象和骆驼,选项里有大象和狼,还有大象和骆驼,那我觉得就得选大象和骆驼了吧。
8.问哪个是specificexample for economic benefit?
五组动物,都出现过,有点难找。后来发现只有elephant和 wolves算讲的比较详细,而且是分开在两个段落里出现的例子,要找一下的。另外有两三组答案,每组两个动物好像原文中都是是直接成对出现的,应该可以排除。可能这个问题的key words是“specific”, 而不是“economic”

TOP

2.1.7 自然保护区
By dawnie
自然保护区。主要讲了自然保护区的限制。比如很难判断哪些物种更需要被保护,或者忽略一些濒危的人们不熟悉的物种。都分别举了一些例子,很多动物名。

TOP

2.1.8 动物药材和谷物关系
By sisiosisi
讲什么animal herbs和cereal的关系一直被认为是成反比的,后来发现好像也不一定是这样,质疑了原有的论据,提供了其他原因。之后又说,其实,这两的关系也不一定是成反比例,其实也有可能成正比。全文不长,但是题目有点绕,得仔细点。

TOP

*2.1.9 空气中CO2含量
V1 By sisiosisi
是说科学家发现空气中CO2含量从1700年到现在的的数据有点奇怪,就是如果按照1700那时的趋势,应该远高于现在观测的。后来有个人提供了一个解释,原因是北半球从20世纪开始丛林复苏明显复苏,原因是野外的fire和一种什么行为得到明显的遏制。全篇主旨就是解释刚开始CO2含量的这个奇怪现象,然后给那个人的解释提供支持。

V2 by 斑斑JOYCE
还有一篇 共两段
第一段是说一个northern 什么地方 大家都以为他CO2排的很多 其实他排的很少 然后一个科学家就开始研究这个地方为什么以前排的多现在排放这个少了 而且变成了一个CO2的sink 还是什么的 这个科学家收集了很多factors的信息
第二段是研究过程。有两个时间段 一个是1890年之前 一个是1920年之后 反正1920之后northern这个地方CO2就排的少了
考古
【未确认】
co2排放的影响
V1 by sunmoon115
还有第一篇阅读讲一段时期内CO2排放量大增,但是实际上大气中的CO2没有像排放量那样大增,作者说是因为某块地方的森林吸收了CO2,转化成了树木的形式。第二段讲为了证明这个,必须考虑森林的LOST和增加哪个多,最后`结论是增加的多,所以证明了这个看法。
题目也不难

V2 by精灵花开
森林、树与二氧化碳排放量的关系。

V3 by lovepova (620)
最后一篇没见过:是讲环境保护的, 说二氧化碳的排放量比预计的少了,为什么,一个学者认为是因为北半球的森林吸收了二氧化碳,并转化为wood,学者比较了几种factors来support her theory, 说在20世纪和19世纪末的二氧化碳的排放量比较,发现20世纪少了什么的, 具体的不记得,因为读得太匆匆, 不过有道题是问那个会削弱学者的说法,还有主旨题,文章挺短,不难的~)  

考古 by somervill
"D1 1700 年以后,CO2 在大气中的的含量增加了。但是没有预计中增加的那么多。A scholar 提出那是因为很多CO2被Wood 的成长吸收了。
D2 进一步阐述这个学者的观点。讲在1890接下来的40年中。大量的tree lodging,deforestration caused large amounts of CO2 to realese to atmosphere. But since 1920, this phonemenon decreased. 大量的树木成长从而吸收了CO2。这就解释了为什么CO2相对少的原因。
"
版本2
1).有这么一篇:18XX年CO2(Ets显示的居然不是英文让我蛮奇怪的)按趋势是要大幅度增加的,可是实际的情况却没有.有个人N 提出一个假说:在空气中的二氧化碳被植物吸收了,形成一种sink碳.然后就说道理:一种平衡,是植物吸收的碳和植物经过燃烧,释放到空气中,有证据显示 说:XX地方的植被面积种类大大的增加了,然后也是一些evidence.....题目不难,这篇是55行的短文章

版本3
还有一篇讲1920年到现在,二氧化碳在大气中的含量在升高,但其实地球释放的比到达大气的还要多,为什么呢〉 一个科学家通过研究发现1920年以前 forest是一个二氧化碳的source,因为燃烧等原因。而近年来数增加的量大于了燃烧之类的量,使得forest成了二氧化碳的absobtion。 有一个主题题,我选得是解释paradox还有两个细节定位题,都很简单

TOP

2.2.0 生物燃料
By紫苏月白
有一篇是biofuel的,是讲现在可以使各种植物转化成biofuel,然后转化过程中有一些附加产物可以做成助燃剂(就是和石油一起提炼出来的那种= =)有题此处;这篇印象最清楚,是最后一篇阅读,当时还happy终于有一篇看的懂了,现在看来是等级低阿Orz...

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看