返回列表 发帖

[逻辑资料] 3月27日换题库了——GMAT逻辑新题汇总(1-19题)

1.垃圾回收问题  by 海蓝色 V 35

有个是说某个地方原来是全部把垃圾弄到一个垃圾场什么的,后来把那个plastic的给了一个private的地方专门回收,可以减少成本,

assumption

我选的是未来这个地区的人用plastic的数量不会下降。(狗主人不确定)

还有个选项是说分出来这部分垃圾的成本不是很高。

收藏 分享

2.OG的变体-鸟类是恐龙那道题
  OG 中的原题出现了!(by piscesu)
Networks of blood vessels in bats’ wings serve only to disperse heat generated in flight. This heat is generated only because bats flap their wings. Thus paleontologists’ recent discovery that the winged dinosaur Sandactylus had similar networks of blood vessels in the skin of its wings provides evidence for the hypothesis that Sandactylus flew by flapping its wings, not just by gliding.

In the passage, the author develops the argument by
(A) forming the hypothesis that best explains several apparently conflicting pieces of evidence
(B) reinterpreting evidence that had been used to support an earlier theory
(C) using an analogy with a known phenomenon to draw a conclusion about an unknown phenomenon
(D) speculating about how structures observed in present-day creatures might have developed from similar structures in creatures now extinct
(E) pointing out differences in the physiological demands that flight makes on large, as opposed to small, creatures

类似有关鸟类和恐龙的题(by lestatwn)
V1:
Recently discovered fossil evidence casts doubt on the evolutionary theory that dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than to other classes of animals. Fossils show that some dinosaurs had hollow bones-a feature found today only in warm blooded creatures, such as birds, that have a high metabolic rates. Dinosaurs had well-developed senses of sight and hearing, which is not true of present-day cold blooded creatures like reptiles. The highly arched mouth roof of some dinosaurs would have permitted them to breathe while eating, as fast –breathing animals, such as birds, need to do.Today all fast-breathing animals are warm blooded. Finally, fossils reveal that many dinosaurs had a pattern of growth typical of warm-blooded animals.

The argument in the passage proceeds by

(A)Attempting to justify one position by demonstrating that an opposition is based on erroneous information.
(B)Establishing a general principle that it then uses to draw a conclusion
about a particular case
(C)Dismissing a claim made about the present on the basis of historical
evidence
(D)Assuming that if all members of a category have a certain property then all things with that property belong to the category
(E)Presenting evidence that a past phenomenon is more similar to one than the other of two present day

V2:
Paleontologists hypothesize that modern birds evolved from the family of dinosaurs that included Tyrannosaurus rex. This hypothesis would be strongly supported if evidence that dinosaurs from this family had a body covering resembling feathers could be found, but so far no such evidence has been found. Which of the following, if true, would most help the paleontologists explain why no evidence of feathered dinosaurs has yet been found?

1.Fossilized dinosaurs have shown many birdlike characteristics, such as bone structure and wing like arms.
2.If birds are in fact the descendants of dinosaurs, then it can be argued that the dinosaurs never really died out.
3.Flying dinosaurs such as the Pteranodon, which is not thought to have been related to modern birds, do not appear to have had feathers.
4.Soft tissues such as skin and feathers do not fossilize like bones, and therefore are far less likely to have left permanent evidence in the fossil record.
5.The thousands of dinosaur fossils excavated by paleontologists represent only a tiny fraction of the billions of dinosaurs that once lived.

TOP

3.人类行走问题
ape进化来的某种动物(O开头的单词,不认识啊)被发现在树林里有时会直立行走。由此提供证据,人类不是在迁移到grassland后开始直立行走的,而是在树林里时就开始了。
找weaken理由

TOP

4. 动物栖息地问题
一个north-什么的地方(据推测应该是座山)有着superdiversity of animals,讲到某个valley的地理情况,有关专家认为这是因为地质地理上的因素,然后很多动物就选择栖息在这片美好的土地上了,问选项中哪个best support the conclusion
选项:south-什么地方的动物貌似不diverse;
      还有个deeper valley 生物更加diverse,狗主人选了这个,很不确定。。。;
       还有动物因为south-north orientation所以栖息

TOP

5.犯罪率的问题
某市警察局在downtown安了很多camera防止犯罪,但是2005年的整个city的犯罪率还高于2004年
问下列哪些答案解释了2005年犯罪率不降反升的原因:
选项:A.     2005年由于缺乏保养,很多安在downtown的camera都out of work(不足以证明为什么犯罪率会不将反升)
      B.     2005年总的犯罪率跟其他年份相比,其实是在下降的

TOP

6.医院和烟税
  某地准备新开一个医院,然后要征收cigarette tax,但是调查发现,如果征税的话那么来自于其他cigarette tax高的地方的烟民就不会在本地买烟了,这就使本地的收入大幅下降。
问:下列哪项是在征税之前政府必须考虑得:
选项:A.现在的税率是多少?
      B. 本地的税率比外地的高多少?

TOP

7. 植物与环境污染问题
说是一个地方的居民喜欢栽长在水中的植物,他们会把多出来的一种植物倒进河里,污染环境。有个人说如果居民自觉点环境就不会被污染。
问weaken.
我选的风会把这种没根的植物带到远方。(这个还是比较确定……)

TOP

8.夜间新闻问题
有个关于夜间新闻的什么~说是夜间新闻是一种很好的资源,因为它的新闻量和什么是一样的……哎,人老了~记不住了。
问evaluate.
选wether 人们看夜间新闻的平均时间是否跟什么一样

TOP

9.小孩子安全问题
调查显示小孩子(系安全带)坐在前排比后排的受伤多,不系安全带时,也是前排受伤多,结论是要让孩子坐后排,
然后问assumption

以往资料:
小孩儿坐系安全带的问题

版本一:
Editorialist: Additional restrictions should be placed on drivers’ licenses of teenagers because teenagers lack basic skills. Even though drivers of age nineteen and younger make up only 7 percent of registered driers, there are responsible for over 14 percent of traffic fatalities.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument that teenagers lack basic driving skill EXCEPT:
(A) Teenagers tend to drive older and less stable cars than other drivers.
(B) Teenagers and their passengers are less likely to use seat belts and shoulder straps than others.
(C) Teenagers drive, on average, over twice as far each year as other drivers.
(D) Teenagers cause car accidents that are more serious than those caused by others.
(E) Teenagers are likely to drive with more passengers than the average driver.

参考答案:D
版本二:旧JJ考古
对于乘汽车的儿童,在发生交通事故时不系安全带往往是要比系安全带冒更大风险的。在系了安全带的情况下,坐在后座的儿童比坐在前座的儿童更加安全。Moreover, 在不系安全带的情况下,坐在后座的儿童仍然要比坐在前座的儿童更加安全。综上,无论如何都让儿童坐后面好了。问削弱。我选了:当孩子们坐在后座时,他们会很经常的在无意间解开安全带。另一个让我犹豫了许久的选项:当儿童系了安全带坐在前座时,他们并不会比不系安全带而坐在后座承担更大危险。

前排还是后排?
V1 from nancy891001 (720)

坐汽车时,坐后排比坐前排要安全,然而不系安全带也会有很大的危险,但在后排不系安全带比前排不系安全带危险要less些,所以坐汽车坐后排能减少事故伤害。问削弱
选项有:更多发生的事故中坐后排受伤的比较多。
坐后排的人更容易不系安全带
V2 from mathjj2009
一题是在系安全带的情况下,小孩子在后座比在前座发生事故可能性底。不系安全带,事故会上升,但在后座还是比在前座安全。问反对。选“小孩子在后座更容易自己解开安全带”确认答案

考古
V1(770)一项调查发现,小朋友们坐汽车的时候,发生交通事故的时候不系安全带的时候坐在后排座位要比坐在前排座位受伤的概率小。系安全带的时候坐在后排座位受伤的概率也比坐在前排座位少。所以得出结论,小朋友们应该坐在后排的座位上。问削弱。我选的是坐在后排座位上的小朋友倾向于不系安全带。
还有一个选项挺绕的,sorry 我不太记得了。。。

V2一题是在系安全带的情况下,小孩子在后座比在前座发生事故可能性底。不系安全带,事故会上升,但在后座还是比在前座安全。问反对。选“小孩子在后座更容易自己解开安全带”

V3不系安全带坐在车子前排的小孩车祸受伤率比坐在后排不系安全带小孩高。但是系了安全带前排小孩受伤率还是高于后排小孩,所以后排比前排安全。问削弱。

V4 (730)补充选项细节:就是选小孩会Remove安全带

TOP

10. 政府指导问题
一种治小孩子什么病的要最近几年用得很多,然后GOVERMENT发觉这样不好,就让少用,然后真的用量就减少了。所以,goverment 的指导是有用的。
问Strenghen.  
我选的是得这种病的孩子的数量没减少,其他选项记不得了。。。)楼主貌似是选错了吧,这个应该是weaken的选项

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看