返回列表 发帖
mihu, did you miss a ", " before "that"???

but the difference between "that" and "which" really confuse me

TOP

primefang, I checked it, no "," before "that". 限定与非限定是关键,但我也没有吃透。
Sur la place chacun passe, chacun vien, chacun va; droles de gens que ces gens-la! 左岸的对面依然是左岸,跟遥远相对的依旧是遥远。

TOP

mihu, here's an example from OG:

258. The British sociologist and activist Barbara Wootton once noted as a humorous example of income maldistribution that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning annually exactly what she then earned as director of adult education for London.
(A) that the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo was earning
(B) that the elephant, giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, had been earning
(C) that there was an elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo, and it earned
(D) the elephant that gave rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and was earning
(E) the elephant giving rides to children at the Whipsnade Zoo and that it earned

此题答案是A,A是限定性定语从句。
而对于B,OG上有这样的解释:
In B, the structure of “noted... that the elephant, giving rides ..., had been earning” falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant--that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information. 我觉得可以把分词短语giving。。。看成是非限定性的修饰成分,如果这儿用which gave rides...,应该也是错的。

不知道我说清楚了没有:)

TOP

谢谢,非常清楚。
Sur la place chacun passe, chacun vien, chacun va; droles de gens que ces gens-la! 左岸的对面依然是左岸,跟遥远相对的依旧是遥远。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看