myice

4        15        imwangpeina  daisyyulan doogypoo mousehyl777        "Nations should cooperate to develop regulations that limit children’s access to adult material on the Internet.”*
*The Internet is a worldwide computer network
"        见sheet11        8-28 前        8月30日        9月6日        9月11日

myice

提纲：
The issue here is whether an international effort to regulate children's access to adult material on the Internet is worthwhile. In my view, nations should attempt to regulate such access by cooperative regulatory effort. I base this view on the universality and importance of the interest in protecting children from harm, and on the inherently global nature of the problem.
    Adults everywhere have a serious interest in limiting children's access to pornographic material. Pornographic material tends to confuse children----distorting their notion of sex, of themselves as sexual beings, and of how people ought to treat one another. Particularly in the case of domination and child pornography, the messages children receive from pornographic material cannot contribute in a healthy way to their emerging sexuality. Given this important interest that knows no cultural bounds, we should regulate children's access to sexually explicit material on the internet.
    国际合作在这中间十分必要.因为这种犯罪的遏止如同当年控制臭氧空洞(ozone depletion)的元凶PRIME CRIMINAL(CFC)时候一样单独靠一个国家的力量这种污染是无法遏止的.
    诚然,会遇到很大的政治制约(POLITICAL HURDLE)

1.       pornographic material has seriously negative effect on children-misleading their sense of sex, of the normal relationships between people, and of themselves as sexual beings. 儿童的好奇心以及缺乏正确的认识，are vulnerable to the bad influence of such adults materials，从而distract their concentration from study to those distorted notions. 人们有责任和义务帮助孩子，protect them from being hurt and influenced by such materials.
2.       However, 国家范围内的regulations lose their previous effectiveness because of the development of internet. Just as the companies which contaminate the natural environment move to other countries after being punished, so the company offering pornographic materials on line can move to other parts of the world to avoid punishment. 所以，国家联合起来，非常有必要。
可以通过象环保那样的联合的和约。
3.       Admittedly, 有困难，与甚至敌对的国家hostile  但是不能放弃努力。


Optional words:
Regulation/ law/ restriction
Limit/confine/.control/ hamper/ inhibit/
Thesis sentence:
View1: adult material on the internet may have terrible affect on children with immature point of view and judgment.  
Evidence: pornographic material. tends to confuse children----distorting their notion of sex, and of how people ought to treat one another.
View2:since Internet has no national boundaries, nations should attempt to regulate such access by cooperative regulatory effort.

myice

1        45        kalinda        The most effective way for a businessperson to maximize profits over a long period of time is to follow the highest standards of ethics.”        见sheet12        8-28 前

myice

提纲：
反面的例子可以是说如果从最高的道德规范来看有些污染环境的行业根本就不应该存在。但是从企业的长期发展来看以及从社会的福利最大化来看，只要污染控制在一定范围就好。如化工厂只要把排污控制在国家规定的范围就好。
1.         道德不明确，每个人的标准不一样
2.         法律立法时符合大多数人的要求明确具体
3.         时滞可以用提高立法效率来解决

1.         支持者会认为, 高道德会赢得reputation and trust; 第一, 高道德生产高质量的产品以及service,顾客稳定stable share of the market; 第二, 高道德会让员工满意度提高(公平，平等). 从而attract those applicants with high ability and keep the employees loyal to the company---最终导致高的productivity.
例子：Bayer, one of the largest pharmaceutic companies in the world, announced that the company would cease production of one of its major products, because of the hazardous ingredients it contained. By doing so, the company suffers great loss on profitability, but gains strong public support and understanding, which can contribute to the long-term success of the company.
2.         但在更多的情况下, 高道德也许不equal to maximal profit. 比如,a, 如果把道德放在第一位的话,企业的executive很可能无法执行裁员活动complete the normal administration, such as raising the price, reducing the superabundant staff…  b, 高道德的话，很可能采用最高标准的环保生产——这样很不是cost-effective.   总之，Following such undue concern about ethics, the company may find it impossible to survive in the radical competitive market, let alone to gain large profit.

View1: the definition of highest standards of ethics vary from person to person and time to time. Therefore, it is impractical to find and then stick to the highest standards of ethics.
View2: the regulations and laws of authorities are more feasible and suitable standards to follow.
View3: while waiting for government regulations may draw back the processes of eliminating the ill actions, we can count on the authorities to speed up the process of refining the laws and regulations.

myice

2        42        lukeshi88 以后再说        Scientists are continually redefining the standards for what is beneficial or harmful to the environment. Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.        9-11更新见sheet15        8-28 前        9月11日

myice

 1. everyone should be encouraged to participate. managers should talk to employees from time to time to get their ideas about future strategy.... 对组织怎么怎么好
     2. 如果大家都要负责，这样反而降低性积极性。如果公司董事会成员也要为日常的经营负责，愿意参加的人就少，献计献策的积极性也没那么高
     3. 举通用今年发生的事情为例，说明个人决策并负责的好处。如果不是Ed Whitacre 大权在握，几月前干掉了原CEO，通用至少没那么快可以又还钱又IPO

By  iamduzhe



犬15
狗主人请大家忽略下面他那个变成argument的思路吧：
1. 套用了fallacy of either or, 作者说要不obey 要不 disobey 其实还有在两者中间的区域. 不一定看不惯一个法律就一定要去违法, 还可以不合作嘛.
2. 法律是collective negotiation的结果, 如果你违法了 可能会对他人造成影响.  这样就不好了. 而且有可能你自己还要受罚 更不好了...(~.~ 不知道在写什么...)
3. 看不惯法律有多种途径表达. 不一定要disobey law 可以去选总统 把law干掉. 差不多就这样.

PS.AI犬里那个象issue的argument思路也出自同一位狗主,杯具哇. 不过其实只要都言之成理也是不太要紧的.                 BY Lucymouse

myice

犬28
不对，应该迅速行动。
论点一：随着科技和资本的快速扩散，各公司的产品越来越难以被普通消费者区分，因此公司的reputation尤其重要。消费者看来，environmentally friendly = responsible company = trustable products。
论点二：政府机构一般都比较官僚，制定regulations需要很久，如果公司不迅速改进，有可能被竞争对手抢了先。让步：不停地改进当然也会损伤公司，这就要看direcotr的判断能力了

myice

4                宋宋 stepdiao satolason13 热污染物2        "For the sake of national security, the governments should have the access to the library checkout records and Internet activity history of their citizens.
为了保护国家安全，政府可以对任何想保密的消息进行保密。
(考古)To preserve national security, the governments should be authorized to keep secret the information as they wish.
"                8-28 前        8月28日        9月8日        9月9日

myice

4        5         rainow88 iamduzhe chenping0123 阿彻        All groups and organizations should function as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilities and duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for a project or task is not an effective way to get work done.        sheet15        8-28 前        9月2日        9月7日        9月9日

myice

 1. everyone should be encouraged to participate. managers should talk to employees from time to time to get their ideas about future strategy.... 对组织怎么怎么好
     2. 如果大家都要负责，这样反而降低性积极性。如果公司董事会成员也要为日常的经营负责，愿意参加的人就少，献计献策的积极性也没那么高
     3. 举通用今年发生的事情为例，说明个人决策并负责的好处。如果不是Ed Whitacre 大权在握，几月前干掉了原CEO，通用至少没那么快可以又还钱又IPO

By  iamduzhe



犬15
狗主人请大家忽略下面他那个变成argument的思路吧：
1. 套用了fallacy of either or, 作者说要不obey 要不 disobey 其实还有在两者中间的区域. 不一定看不惯一个法律就一定要去违法, 还可以不合作嘛.
2. 法律是collective negotiation的结果, 如果你违法了 可能会对他人造成影响.  这样就不好了. 而且有可能你自己还要受罚 更不好了...(~.~ 不知道在写什么...)
3. 看不惯法律有多种途径表达. 不一定要disobey law 可以去选总统 把law干掉. 差不多就这样.

PS.AI犬里那个象issue的argument思路也出自同一位狗主,杯具哇. 不过其实只要都言之成理也是不太要紧的.                 BY Lucymouse