- 精华
- 301
- 积分
- 162885
- 经验
- 162885 点
- 威望
- 15221 点
- 金钱
- 43960 ¥
- 魅力
- 28358
|
Round 2 / On-campus / Second-year Student (Published March 10th, 2008)
On Monday I took a tour of the Darden Grounds with a second-year and was surprised when one of the people in my tour group, having just completed his interview, told me "have your monologue ready because that's what they want to hear." On Tuesday I had my interview with a second-year. To start out, he impressed upon me that he wanted it to be informal, conversational, laid-back, etc., which was also supported by his unexpectedly casual attire. He told me the interview was blind and that he knew nothing about me. Although I can't remember the exact wording of any particular question, here's basically how it went.
He first asked "tell me about yourself." Because of the other interviewee's "monologue" comment the day prior, I asked "would you like me to give you a brief overview and let you ask more questions, or would you like me to give a 30 minute monologue?" As you can imagine, I was floored when he said "a thirty minute monologue sounds great." I probably spoke for approximately 10-15 minutes regarding my background and gave a number of specifics. I then felt like it was a good time to let him ask some questions, since I wasn't entirely sure what he wanted to hear.
He then asked "why MBA, why now?" When I mentioned the social/extracurricular part of the MBA as a reason, he raised his eyebrows and said "I don't think anyone has ever said that before, but that's a great point because it's a big part of the MBA." After I finished my response he asked "why Darden?" which wasn't a surprise. We then talked about my goals. After, he asked "assume it's the first day of class and I'm in your group, why should I be excited? Also assume it's a month later and I'm complaining to my wife about you, what would I be saying? This is not a strengths and weaknesses question." In all honesty, I'm not entirely sure what he was getting at by saying "this isn't a strengths and weaknesses question" but I thought I responded well enough.
He then asked "what concerns do you have about Darden?" which I also thought was a difficult question. I responded by saying "I think my concern was addressed during the tour I took yesterday" and went on to explain that I wanted to make sure that Darden's rankings, while impressive in my opinion, were viewed as such by all recruiters, since some companies focus exclusively on rankings. The answer I received during the tour, was that Darden's professors are so focused on teaching that they don't have as much published research as other schools, which tends to drag down their rankings. The way I positioned my response to the interviewer's "Darden concerns" question was I said something like "some companies focus exclusively on rankings and only hire, for example, top ten programs...but I've learned that's not a problem for Darden." By describing my "concern" that way I was trying to avoid sounding like I personally cared about the rankings, but rather, that I just wanted to confirm that Darden, indeed, would allow me to reach my career goals. I don't think I raised any red flags because I tried to be very cautious in how I responded and he seemed pleased that I had already proactively addressed my "concern" the previous day and could speak insightfully regarding Darden's rankings. In fact, I said that my "concern" really had become another Darden strength (having teaching-focused professors) and he wholeheartedly supported my response and went on to confirm and reiterate almost everything I said. He said Darden is placing more emphasis on publishing research to try to boost their rankings, so apparently it's something they are well aware of and are working to correct. For that reason I don't think I came across as unfair, or petty since the two second-year's almost identical responses seemed to indicate it's a subject that is discussed openly at Darden. Maybe I shot myself in the foot, but he appeared impressed that I could give the same favorable response that is likely widely used at Darden.
After that, he closed by asking me if I had some questions for him. The fact that he is going into consulting with Bain allowed me to slip in a consulting question, which I followed up with a quick one about life in Charlottesville. In retrospect there are some things I wish I had said differently, but I thought it went well. I have no way of knowing how my interview compared to other interviews so I guess we'll have to wait and see what they say at the end of the month. Based on the questions he asked after I spoke about my background for 10-15 minutes, I assume he was looking for basically a recitation of my first essay. I think that would have been the ideal way to give the 30 minute monologue he asked for initially. Essentially, background, why MBA, why now, why Darden, short-term goals, long-term goals. |
|