- 精华
- 16
- 积分
- 15226
- 经验
- 15226 点
- 威望
- 1520 点
- 金钱
- 5304 ¥
- 魅力
- 3411
|
GWD24-7
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa and Asia has destroyed much of the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant sanctuaries(自然保护区) were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since
即使提供大象足够的自然植被,他们仍会侵略耕地
A. when elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.范围太大不够具体
B. Foraging elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that they do not eat.范围太大
C. Some of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has been allowed to return to its natural state.
D. Elephants tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.
E. Elephant sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.好像是在说大象应该会转向自然植被。与文中不符合
其实,我觉得,逻辑上没有所谓的有关和无关的"标准".最重要是找到题目问的是什么!(并非仅仅只是support, weaken, assumption等抽象的东西),要求你进行分析的对象是什么,分析的方向是什么!几乎每个逻辑题的题目都有一个自己的逻辑链,有时候看似都是陈述事实,但作者都是有倾向的! 我一搬都是把这些元素抽象出来.我做逻辑的方法就是,
1.题目描述的对象,作者的倾向.
2.问题的对象,要求回答的方向.
3.找到那个方向的答案.
像上面那道题目, 1.整个题干: 对象: 大象, 作者倾向: 大象要吃种植物.不吃野生的.
2. 问为什么大象要吃种植物. 回答方向就是找原因.
3.找答案.prefer.... |
|