返回列表 发帖

GWD 28-23

GWD 28-23 ask NN for help

28-23: Goronian lawmaker: Goronia’s Cheese Importation Board, the agency responsible for inspecting all wholesale shipments of cheese entering Goronia from abroad and rejecting shipments that fail to meet specified standards, rejects about one percent of the cheese that it inspects. Since the health consequences and associated costs of not rejecting that one percent would be negligible, whereas the cost of maintaining the agency is not, the agency’s cost clearly outweighs the benefits it provides.

Knowing the answer to which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the lawmaker’s argument?

A: Are any of the types of cheeses that are imported into Goronia also produced in Goronia?

B: Has the Cheese Importation Board, over the last several years, reduced its operating costs by eliminating inefficiencies within the agency itself?

C: Does the possibility of having merchandise rejected by the Cheese Importation Board deter many cheese exporters from shipping substandard cheese to Goronia?

D: Are there any exporters of cheese to Goronia whose merchandise is never rejected by the Cheese Importation Board?

E: How is the cheese rejected by the Cheese Importation Board disposed of?

收藏 分享

比较清楚,应该是C.

C,如果回答yes,则结论 the agency’s cost clearly outweighs the benefits it provides.受到削弱。

如果回答no,则结论the agency’s cost clearly outweighs the benefits it provides。获得支持。

TOP

选C。“你说这个委员会没啥用,只拒了1%的坏家伙。我说:委员会存在时,一大帮坏蛋压根就没敢来——起到震慑作用了,你能说这个委员会起的作用只是表面上的1%吗!!???”

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看