返回列表 发帖

大全-1-4

In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s median-priced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing.
Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s median-priced house?
(A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people.
(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000.

这个题小弟怎么看不懂啊,哪位大牛帮帮忙啊,谢谢
(C) Millington’s median-priced house cost $80,000.
(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent.
(E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing.

收藏 分享

The question states that there is a cut-off: median income families afford median-priced house. You should know that below median income will not afford. The question asks how income below median could afford median-priced house. Now do the math:

A. No effect.
B. Income below a lower figure means that they cannot afford the median house
C. Higher price than the median means lower income cannot afford.
D. Lower interest rate indicates that interest exp is lower, thus enabling lower than median income to afford the house.
E. Less percentage is allocated to housing indicates they can only afford lower-priced house.

Therefore D is the answer.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看