返回列表 发帖

TT语法--OG15


OG No.15
In his research paper, Dr. Frosh,medical director of the Payne Whitney Clinic, distinguishes (moodngs, which may be violent without their being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis.)

B. moodngs, perhaps violent without being grounded in mental disease, and genuine manic-depressive psychosis.
C. between moodngs ,which may be violent without being grounded in mental disease, and genuine manic-depressive psychosis.
D. between moodngs, perhaps violent without being grounded in mental disease, from genuine manic-depressive psychosis.
E. genuine manic-depressive psychosis and moodngs,which may be violent without being grounded in mental disease.

The answer is C. OG中说B中perhaps violent is awkward and less clear thanC中which may be violent,为什么呢?我觉得好像两个的表达的意思都应该是一样的啊!也就是说如果B中加上between的话,为什么还是应该选C呢?
什么是把握一种表达是不是awkward或者是否clear的标准呢?
收藏 分享

这个类似的问题原来joy问过了,因为which使得 violent 的逻辑主语更加明确,如果没有的话好象这个violent 的逻辑主语是其他的事情。这是一个常见的问题.

TOP

可以看成是省略形式, 但是这种省略不太好而已。
相视一笑,莫逆于心。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看