CXD P102-19 完全无头绪。。。期待牛人解答

bodkicker

"Headhunters" are firms that, for a fee, undertake to recruit for their clients personnel who are greatly needed yet hard to find. The clients, in turn, require that they be offlimits to headhunters whose services they buy; i. e. , headhunters cannot raid one client's staff on behalf of other clients.

Of the following, which would, if feasible, be the best strategy for a company to pursue if that compa company wanted both to use headhunters to fill a vacancy and, if successful in filling the vacancy, to reduce the risk of losing the newly hired employee to competitor?

A  Find out which headhunters recruit workers of the sort being sought and employ all those headhunters.

B  Find out which headhunter has the highest success rate in recruiting for its clients and hire that firm.

C  Find out how much the company's competitors currently pay staff of the sort being sought and offer to pay prospective emloyees higher salaries.

D  Find out whether any of the company's competitors are seeking to recruit workers of the sort being sought and, if so, make sure not to hire the same headhunters that they hire.

E  Find out which of the company's competitors are on the client lists of the headhunter who are being considered for the job.

tulip37

IMO: D;
we should split the relationship between  vacancy the headhunter provide and the competetor the headhunter service. D successfully did so.

bodkicker

我也选了D啊，但是答案说是A啊

robinyue

逻辑说那么多理论都没用，重要的是看明白意思。

题目问，一个公司有什么办法能够找到想要的员工，但又避免被其他对手公司给撬走。答案A的意思是看哪家猎头公司在找这样的员工，然后雇佣所有的这些公司。这样清楚了么？

bodkicker

这个我理解，可是D为什么不对呢，避免雇佣竞争对手雇佣的猎头公司不是也能避免想要的员工被别人抢走吗？

saracarter

D不对因为，竞争对手雇佣的猎头公司可以挖你的人呀
所以，正确的做法是“雇佣竞争对手雇佣的猎头公司”，而不是避免。

SDty8

同问，依然纠结于D.

applemay

D is wrong because your men will be lost if you do not choose the

headhunters that your competitors are using. so you cannot avoid losing

the newly-hired employees to your competitors.