返回列表 发帖

FEIFEI逻辑9题?

9. Astronauts who experience weightlessness frequently get motion sickness. The astronauts see their own motion relative to passing objects, but while the astronauts are weightless their inner ears indicate that their bodies are not moving. The astronauts’ experience is best explained by the hypothesis that conflicting information received by the brain about the body’s motion causes motion sickness.

 

Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the hypothesis above?

 

A.       During rough voyages ship passengers in cabins providing a view of the water are less likely to get motion sickness than are passengers in cabins providing no view.

B.        Many people who are experienced airplane passengers occasionally get motion sickness.

C.        Some automobile passengers whose inner ears indicate that they are moving and who have a clear view of the objects they are passing get motion sickness.

D.       People who have aisle seats in trains or airplanes are as likely to get motion sickness as are people who have window seats.

E     Some astronauts do not get motion sickness even after being in orbit for several days

 

 

答案是A。可是我觉得A 和题目正好相反啊。不是说当两种情况一致(也就是不conflict)的时候是没有motion sickness 的,而两种情况不一致(conflicting information )的时候才会有motion sickness吗》

那么,rough voyages ship passengers in cabins providing a view of the water 是有参照物了啊,那么就应该产生conflict 啊。而 passengers in cabins providing no view就是没有参照物啊,就是说passengers的inner ear 和他看到的都是not move的啊,那就应该不容易产生 motion sickness 啊?

收藏 分享

仔细看C与原文有出处,题干说的时内耳道是感知他们的身体不动,而C中正好相反。
A:提供了一个conflicting information,就是没有看到周围的东西,却感觉周围的东西与能看到周围而感知到的东西相比,前者更容易得motion sickness。

上面是我在做这题时的一些感想,我当时选C。

TOP

我觉得是看到自己和参照物比自己是运动的  和   失重的时候感觉的自己是不动的  conflict information 。 A 是不对啊。

TOP

A说的是在船上,看不见东西比看见东西更容易MOTION SICK.

结论说的是CONLICTING INFO PRODUCES SICKNESS.

那么人们在船上在动, 如果看得见东西在动,那就不容易产生MOTION SICKNESS. 反之, 如果看不见东西在动,则会产生CONFLICT(船在动, 而自己却感觉没有动). 有点绕....

TOP

我不同意楼主的意见,上面说只有两种信息不一致是才会产生information  conflict ,从而产生MOTION SICK。楼上的GG是不是弄反了呢?

也就是说人在船上并没有感觉到在动(inner ears indicate that their bodies are not moving),但是如果在no  view 的情况下,也就是没有(information  conflict ), 那么就不会有MOTION SICK。但是如果是 providing a view of the water,那么就有了参照物,那么就会information  conflict 了。

TOP

原文提到的“冲突”的信息是---失重时内耳道感觉人是不动的,因此传递给大脑的信息是“人不动”,周围的物体“动",这两者构成了冲突,因此会有MOTION SICKNESS。

A ,人自身传递给大脑的信息肯定是“人动”(没失重),当有水的VIEW 时,周围的物体递给大脑的信息也是“动",两者没有冲突,因此少MOTION SICKNESS。而当没有水的VIEW 时,人感受到自身还是“动",但周围物体递给大脑的信息却是“不动",冲突产生,因此多MOTION SICKNESS。原理与原文一致,SUPPORT。

C的答案就象A答案中提供有水的VIEW时的情况一样,是一种没构成冲突时的状态,但乘客却有MOTION SICKNESS,与原文的推理是相背的。

TOP

再问:失重→病,同时耳→传达不动信息;那是不是可以得到 A:不失重→耳传达的是动的信息.

还是,B:逆否命题应为耳传达动的信息→不失重.A和B是充要的吗?

请NN们解答!

TOP

A中有个提示的assumption是rough voyage既 乘客的inner ear 感觉船是在动的. 因此看到外景的人的大脑接受的信息不是conflicting的,他们从而就不会motion sickness. 这是无因则无果的加强.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看