the following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment. 有一组织,把修改某规章的提议被发给其成员进行讨论 when more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be. (该规章中的某一规定说):当被提名的候选人超过一个的时候，那些潜在候选人必须同意被提名，并且在他们作出以上同意之前要被告知其它候选人是谁。 which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated? 问：以下哪项与该项提议在逻辑上正确最相关，即:在潜在被提名者给出他们的同意（即同意被提名）前,要知道真正的被提名者名单。也就是问为什么要这样规定. a. the proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are 提议需保证每个被提名者知道其他被提名者是谁—没有回答提问 b. the proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees. 提议需需使得被提名者的选择范围足够的大---原文无此意 c. if there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominees equal treatment with the first. 如果有若干个潜在被提名者,提议要否决最后一个和第一个 --原文无此意 d the proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known. 原文无此意 e. if there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee. 当被提名的候选人超过一个的时候, 提议需保证不是所有的人都是被提名者.---如果所有的人都是被提名者的话,选举就没有办法进行下去了-----所以才会有这样的规定. 对否? 我也对这题头痛. | 
