返回列表 发帖

大全-16-3

3. It would cost Rosetown one million dollars to repair all of its roads. In the year after completion of those repairs, however, Rosetown would thereby avoid incurring three million dollars worth of damages, since currently Rosetown pays that amount annually in compensation for damage done to cars each year by its unrepaired roads.

Which of the following, if true, gives the strongest support to the argument above?

(A) Communities bordering on Rosetown also pay compensation for damage done to cars by their unrepaired roads.

(B) After any Rosetown road has been repaired, several years will elapse before that road begins to damage cars.

(C) Rosetown would need to raise additional taxes if it were to spend one million dollars in one year on road repairs.

(D) The degree of damage caused to Rosetown’s roads by harsh weather can vary widely from year to year.B

(E) Trucks cause much of the wear on Rosetown’s roads, but owners of cars file almost all of the claims for compensation for damage caused by unrepaired roads.

理解不了,请指教,谢谢!!!

收藏 分享

ROSETOWN花了100万修路.修完路后ROSETOWN赚了300万.因为ROSETOWN每年都要花300万去

赔因为烂道路对车造成的损坏.

答案需要支持论点

选B

TOP

谢谢,B是什么意思,我看不出名堂。

TOP

当路修好以后,接下来的几年都不会对车造成损害

TOP

E为什么不对?

TOP

结论说:修路可以避免支出300万,因为如果不修路这些钱要拿来赔偿。

问加强。

E说卡车导致了大部分的路面破坏,但是小汽车申领了绝大多数的赔偿补贴。

其实不管这些钱是赔给谁的,反正如果不修路都是要赔出去的;所以对结论不能构成支持。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看