- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 2676
- 经验
- 2676 点
- 威望
- 242 点
- 金钱
- 683 ¥
- 魅力
- 440
|
65. According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPE, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPE a suntan lotion has.
Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?
A. It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
B. Because some people get sunburned more easily than other, the fact that there are different SPEs cannot be ignored.
C. It cannot be concluded that the SPEs is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
D. It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions required the same application procedures in order to work effectively.
E. There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.
This is exactly the same as No 62. 只有C明确提出不能因为一样东西有作用就说另外一个东西没作用:准确无误指出了原文论证的漏洞。
A, The passage has nothing to do with the “only purpose”.
B, Because the passage has already make clear that people can apply many times of the lotion for difference people, so the idea in choice B is not a lope hole in the reasoning.
C,By pointing out that it is not right to eliminate the effectiveness of SPEs because there are other requirements.
D,There is no assumption in the passage that all suntan lotions required the same application procedures.
E,Anything about manufactures does not bear on the reasoning in the passage. |
|