返回列表 发帖

LSAT: TEST THREE__SECTION I__22

In am experiment, two-year-old boys and their fathers made pie dough together using rolling pins and other utensils. each father-son pair used a rolling pin that was distinctively different from those used by the other father-son pairs, and each father repeated the phrase"rolling pin" each time his son used it. but when the children were asked to identify all of the rolling pins among a group of kitchen utensils that included several rolling pins, each child picked only the one that he had used.

Which one of the following inferences is most supported by the information above?

(A)The children did not grasp the function of rolling pin.
(B)no two children understood the name"rolling pin"to apply to the same object
(C)the children understood that all rolling pins have the same general shape
(D)each child was able to identify correctly only the utensils that he had used.
(E)the children were not able to distinguish the rolling pins they used from other rolling pins.
B. Why D is wrong?
收藏 分享

我当初从钱永强的gre逻辑一本书中获益无穷。
但是我觉得逻辑最关键的是通过练习找到真正适合自己的思路,也就是说把别人的东西融入自己的思路。真正到了考试没有时间分析A推B之类的,只有自己的第一反应就是正确的才能从容的应付考试。
中华国内一亡命徒!

TOP

版祝有没有什么觉得比较好的书或资料介绍一下呢/
xeixie






















愚见

生活是一杯清茶
生活是一杯清茶

TOP

D 错在only。文中的实验只能推出孩子可以认出用过的东西,无法推出孩子无法认出所有没用过的东西。
在逻辑题中,切忌推而广之。再次强调一点,选项中有极端性意思要千万当心。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-3-20 9:59:34编辑过]

中华国内一亡命徒!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看