返回列表 发帖

one CR to warm up

Explanation must be distinguished from justification. Every human action potentially has an explanation, that is with sufficient knowledge it would be possible to give an accurate description of the causes of that action. An action is justified only when the person performing the action has sufficient reasons for the action. According to many psychologists, even when there is a justification for an action, that justification often forms no part of the explanation. The general principle, however, is that only an action whose justification , that is, the reasons for the action, forms an essential part of its explanation is rational.

If the statements in the passage are correct, which one of the following can be properly conclude from them?
A.        When a human action is justified, that action has no explanation.
B.        If there are any reasons among the causes of an action, the that action rational.
C.        Some psychologists believe that the justification for an action never forms an essential part of its explanation.
D.        There are actions whose causes can’t be discovered.
E.        If any human actions are rationa, then reasons must sometimes be causes of actions.
收藏 分享

yes, ,拜托 再帮我看看数学吧 ,留了一些题

TOP

应该是E吧,由文章最后一句,行为要是理性的,只有当确证(REASONS)构成解释的(CAUSES)的基本部分,对吗?混淆选项是D,但我觉得DISCOVERED用的不好。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看