返回列表 发帖

lsat1.2-22请教

22. It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.
Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?
(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
(B) The radioactive material caused a genetic mutation, which, in turn, caused the birth defect. Therefore, the radioactive material caused the birth defect.
(C) The tiny, unseen atom is the source of immense power. It must be its highly complex structure that produces this power.
(D) The city orchestra received more funds from the local government this year than ever before. Clearly this administration is more civic-minded than previous ones.
(E) If I heat water, which is a liquid, it evaporates. If I heat hundreds of other liquids like water, they evaporate. Therefore, if I heat any liquid like water, it will evaporate
题干中的error是何种错误,与各选项如何相关,望大侠指教。
收藏 分享

这种题可以不做的,GMAT不考。按管老板的说法就是:只做假设、加强、削弱。
举杯邀明月,对影成三人。 月既不解饮,影徒随我身。

TOP

the ans in ELSAT is A, got confused too.

TOP

这题答案是不是e啊, 上回也有人问过
丫头认为是e 提干是'一个原因一个结果' 要有第二个结果必须考虑其他原因
而e就犯了一个原因多个结果的错误

^^
Concentrated and Diligent

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看