返回列表 发帖

GWD6-14

Q14:

Political Advertisement:

 

 

Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership.  Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office.  So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.

  1. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
  2. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
  3. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
  4. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.

Answer is E. I don't understand why. Really appreciate for any kindness t explain.

收藏 分享

对于D选项,没看的很懂.the environmentalists’ conclusion和the conclusion of the economist’s argument. 有什么区别吗??

TOP

对于D选项,没看的很懂.the environmentalists’ conclusion和the conclusion of the economist’s argument. 有什么区别吗??

TOP

我觉得用排除法,abc都说市长的不好,d说没什么变化,只有e在说市长好,具体为什么e对还得请高人指点.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看