返回列表 发帖

明白人帮忙看看--一道新东方的逻辑题

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comments.

when more than one nominee is to be named for  an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

which of the following comments concerning the logic of proposal is accurant if it can not be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent  to be nominated?

(a)the proposal would make it possible for each of serveral nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.

(b) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.

(c) If there are several prospetive nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominees equal treatment with the first.
(d) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(e) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

答案是E,可我认为是A.不知为什么不对? 多谢!
收藏 分享

I finally get it ^^
'nominee ' and the 'prospective nominee ' are the same , aren't they ?

^^
Concentrated and Diligent

TOP

谢谢tongxun,我明白了,但是和你想的有点不一样。不论谁是第一个同意的,一个prosepctive nominee的意见不会影响其他人是否同意。

TOP

when more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
主要是你没理解这句话的意思。
主要的意思:在同意前,必须要被告知还有谁是被提名的。
既然这样,谁是第一个同意的??必须要有第一个同意的,其他的才可能同意。但第一个同意的,能知道还有谁同意吗?
也就是说,在0之前,还有正整数吗?
Robert之家-----我的家园

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看