返回列表 发帖

大全-6-18

The value of a product is determined by the ratio of its quality to its price. The higher the value of a product, the better will be its competitive position. Therefore, either increasing the quality or lowering the price of a given product will increase the likelihood that consumer will select that product rather than a competing one.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn above?

(A) It is possible to increase both the quality and the price of a product without changing its competitive position.

(B) For certain segments of the population of consumers, higher-priced brands of some product lines are preferred to the lower-priced brands.

(C) Competing products often try to appeal to different segments of the population of consumers.

(D) The competitive position of a product can be affected by such factors as advertising and brand loyalty.E

(E) Consumers’ perceptions of the quality of a product are based on the actual quality of the product.

I chose A. Can someone explain why A is not correct? Thanks

收藏 分享

A不对是因为如果价格升了,质量升了,但是比例没升,甚至比例下将,而仍然保证了产品竞争地位,就相反削弱了结论。

选E,如果取反,人们不是按照实际质量,而是按照价格来判断一个商品,则可能因为价格减低而不买产品,结论不成立了。

TOP

文中推出的是either increasing the quality or lowering the price,A里面却说both increase,也许是这里出问题了吧。

TOP

A 说 :  有可能同时提高产品质量和价格 , 不失其竞争优势;  题目说的是要么降价,要么提质; 而不是说同时提价提质; GMAT出题那帮人最喜欢玩这些伎俩,唬你入套;

在深圳烤鸡

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看