今天的真题好困惑－－之一

samgxs

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, a high degree of both international accord and ability to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained. A total blockade of Patris’s ports is necessary to an embargo, but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo.

The claims above, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

A: the balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade.
B: as long as international opinion is unanimously against Patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.
C: a naval blockade of Patria’s ports would ensure no goods enter or leave Patria.
D: any trade embargo against Patria would be likely to fail at some time.
E: for a blockade of Patria’s ports to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous.

主要是解释一下逻辑。

BATI巴蒂

你的感觉变的也太快了点...
)))

samgxs

我倒是知道不要充分性。。。不过。。。。。也许还要过一阵子 才可以比较好的理解。不过刚才好像有一点感觉了。

BATI巴蒂

题做多了,你会发现含有这些词语的选项最有可能是答案.
数据不需要充分性, 只要使成立的可能性增大就好. (FROM GWD)

tongxun

likely to 是可能性，at some time 指在将来的某个时候。这在意思上是一致的。

samgxs

为什么要说any ， likely to fail，  at some time，这些词让人比较困惑。感觉就是离的比较远。
看来我还要勤加修炼。

tongxun

提干的逻辑：trade embargo 成功的条件必须有两个：international accord 和prevent goods 。接着提干给出but。。likely to cause international discord，也就是说可能不成功，因为两个条件中有一个不成立。
我选D