返回列表 发帖

885-6-23,这里的动词不需要逻辑主语?

885-6-23. Constance Horner, chief of the LACE w:st="on">United StatesLACE> government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant

(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds not to hire the applicant

(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them

(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hiredA

(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

困惑:“grounds for not hiring an applicant”中hiring的逻辑主语应该是company之类,和that从句的主语不一致,不需要不出来么?

收藏 分享

谢谢!可能是偶钻牛角尖了,但是这个结构挺容易和其它结构混淆起来,比如prevent sb from doing sth.

TOP

这里hiring是动名词,不是分词,所以不必去找逻辑上的主语

如果确实需要找一个,在没有上下文的情况下,我觉得就是United States government

TOP

这句话的意思没有问题,但请问“雇佣”这个动作是谁发出的呢?

TOP

楼上说得有问题。

这句话的意思是

某权威认为申请人五年内吃了乱七八糟的药是不雇佣申请人的理由。

TOP

NN帮忙看看,什么时候要补出逻辑主语,什么时候不要补呢?

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看