返回列表 发帖

大全II-20

20. The Asian American History Association receives approximately 1,000 proposals each year from individuals who wish to present papers at its annual meeting. The association’s officers would like to ensure constant standards of quality in the presentations from year to year. The officers have therefore decided to accept for presentation each year only the best 300 papers selected on the basis of the quality of the proposals submitted.

Of the following, the best criticism of the officers’ plan is that the plan assumes that

(A) Professional associations cannot accept all papers submitted for presentation at their annual meetings.

(B) The total number of proposals submitted to the association will remain at approximately 1,000 in future years.

(C) Each proposal submitted to the association deserves to be considered a serious candidate for presentation.

(D) It is difficult to judge the quality of a paper on the basis of the proposal alone.E

(E) The best 300 papers submitted to the association for presentation will be of the same quality from year to year.

我想問一下 (1)這一題算市weaken題嗎 (2) 請問要問什麼種的思路解這一題????

收藏 分享

你为什么一定要去分evaluation还是weaken或是什么呢? 反正就是道逻辑题, 会做就行了. 我原来根本不去分的, 除非是很明显的, 那我知道是weaken什么的.

TOP

謝謝你  那我如果想成是evaluate是不是說的通呢???

TOP

don't think it's weaken.

Question has two statements here:

1. ensure constant standards of quality in the presentations

2.only the best 300 papers selected on the basis of the quality of the proposals submitted.

So there is a preassumption here: the quality of the proposal is the same as the paper ----- and you can critize that this is not always the case. thus E is the answer.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看