返回列表 发帖

og12的解释,问关于指代~

OG12 Formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as they do to established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.

(A) Formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as they do to established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.

(B) Because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium, formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to new small businesses in the same way as they do to established big businesses.

(C) Because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium, new small businesses are not subject to the same applicability of formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity as established big businesses.

(D) Because new small businesses are growing and are seldom in equilibrium, formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity do not apply to them in the same way as to established big businesses.

(E) New small businesses are not subject to the applicability of formulas for cash flow and the ratio of debt to equity in the same way as established big businesses, because they are growing and are seldom in equilibrium.

In A, the they after because is ambiguous; it seems illogically to refer to Formulas because they and Formulas are each the grammatical subject of a clause and because the previous they refers to Formulas.

我想问,A中的they为什么说就是指Formulas的呢?解释有点不懂.怎么说they和Formulas都是grammatical subject了?难道是主句从句主语就必须一致吗?

难道they没有可能指businesses吗? 我觉得也是可以说的通的..

指教~~

收藏 分享

第一个they 由于后面有do这一照应的动词,所以肯定是代替主语。

至于第二个they,如果主语宾语和其他修饰成分主干都是复数名次,那马应该遵循先主语再宾语最后修饰语的法则判断they的修饰对象。

有点忘了,欢迎讨论。

相视一笑,莫逆于心。

TOP

结构上有可能,但是逻辑上不可能。把they还原成你想指代的东西就可以知道了。

as (they) do to established big businesses

as (businesses) do to established big businesses这样就不可能了吧?

个人意见!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看