返回列表 发帖

关于OG逻辑31题的新问题

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.

B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.

C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and general public.

D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.

E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.

我有一点想不通,书上的正确答案为什么要用might这种可能性的语气,这样难道不会让人觉得那些人可能会也可能不会那样做,这样就不一定能削弱结论了吗

请教,谢谢!

收藏 分享

答案是A.

楼上的,你也说是可能了,那如果他们没有那样做,那就削弱不了了吧.

B个人觉得既不能削弱也不能支持结论。

TOP

这个might在这里是说这些人可能会如何如何.如果他们**了.就会有问题.

这不正是削弱原文么

TOP

答案是A吗?

个人觉得那个B并不能削弱。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看