[转帖]12.23,南京一战,JJ些许:)

正常发挥,51+34, 710,比我预期要高一点,HOHO~先来JJ吧~

A14. “The most successful structure for any business is one that is clearly hierarchical with clearly defined roles for all levels of employee.”

AA,说起来真巧,昨晚睡觉前练了一篇AA,就是今天考试遇到的~

就是那个Volunteer ambulance service vs. Commercial ambulance services的~

MATHS

那个geese hatched的, 有2/3的hatched，在hatched的里面又有3/4能活一个月以上，活了一个月的有2/5不能活一年以上，这个养殖场有400个活了一年以上,问有多少geese，计不太清楚了，好像是天山的题吧！注意那个划线“not”的就行了。

#代表一种运算，有可能是plus, minus, multiply，问#是哪种运算？（1）2#6=6#2；（2）7*（5+3）<>7*5+7*3，选C.

给了一个坐标系，上面有5个点，每个点的坐标都告诉的，问哪个点符合一个不等式，一个个带进去算就行了

根号X，根号Y都是整数，问一下哪个must be integer？有根号(x+y)，根号(x/y)，根号(XY)。。。。,选根号(XY)

一个BOOKSTORE买书的平均价格是25刀，共卖了150，000本，问卖得最便宜的书的价格？（1）the range of the prices is $6.48(cannot remember);(2)价格低于25到的书是高于25刀的两倍；偶选E

MATHS容我在想想啊~~~

VERBLE

我的阅读一直到第9题才出现，弄得我紧张兮兮的，以为前面做得很烂鬼字不让我做RC呢~汗~阅读我就不写了，跟刚才爱睡觉的猫是一模一样的，有那个什么LONE WOLF，ANTIBODY，米国的经济发展缓慢……

SC，我碰到好几道GWD题目，那个黄蜂了，小汽车省油，科学家ANALYZING DATA GATHERD的……，干菜又看到说黄蜂那个是争议题，我把它贴过来，大家再看看，考频还是蛮高的

Yellow jackets number among the 900 or so species of the world’s social wasps, wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of females—the queen and her sterile female workers.

wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of（they没有指代对象）
wasps that live in a highly cooperative and organized society consisting almost entirely of
which means they live in a highly cooperative and organized society, almost all （1^st, means放这里意思不对，其次即使意思正确，语法上是修饰复数名词wasps，动词应为mean）
which means that their society is highly cooperative, organized, and it is almost entirely
living in a society that is highly cooperative, organized, and it consists of almost all (n+ that is adj.不简洁)

CR，也有GWD的，那个黑熊的，

Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

Even homeowners whose yards do not have（out of scope） water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.（Conventional landscape会带来除了水费之外的其他成本）
A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.(out of scope)
It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping. (strengthen, 其他方面成本一样，再加上criticism所描述的省的水费少，加强)
Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.