返回列表 发帖

gwd-17-11

Q11:

Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species. Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates. Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

  1. Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.
  2. It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.
  3. The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.
  4. As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.
  5. In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

请高人指点,谢谢!

收藏 分享

读完B就觉得它是答案了~

上面文章说取消hunting limit能有助于保留其它种类的动物,可是B提出这个法规基本上就是没有什么实效的。也就是说每年猎人们都是一直捕杀雪鹅到预定好的那天为止.(这里可能需要用到一个common sense,就是在美国人们只有冬天在特定的那么两个月里捕猎,都是一种爱好,没有专业的一年到头都捕猎的猎人,所以就算没有那个法规也不可能就此不停的捕杀鹅).

TOP

我也选D, 可是答案是B

TOP

探讨一下,我选d。

文章说结论说geese被猎杀的这段时间给了其他物种休养生息的时间。问削弱。d说由于geese太多了,扩张到了原来不去(也就是猎人也不去)的地方。那其他物种当然还会受到这些没受损伤的geese的危害。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看