Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of
Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should
be banned.
Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-
towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial
benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put
up with the pollution.
Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers
are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that
snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing
which of the following?
A. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can
derive from only one set of circumstances
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is
outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that
outcome
C. Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires
could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D. Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting
the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to
attack it
E. Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as
having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those
people
答案是E
我的问题是E中指的 a certain of people 应该是指文中的local
residents. 但是按照E 讲的deny the effect that...actually benefited
those people （those people = local residents)
文中并没有讲到对local residents的benefit否啊 只是说许多skier are
now kept from visiting by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles
generate.
麻烦NN帮我分析 多谢!!! | 
