求助og13th 62题 关于修饰语的问题

cookiezwy

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete.
(A) the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete
(B) Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, was protected in his afterlife by an army of terracotta warriors that was created more than 2,000 years ago by 700,000 artisans who took more than 36 years to complete it
(C) it took 700,000 arti sans more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors more than 2,000 years ago that would protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, in his afterlife
(D) more than 2,000 years ago, 700,000 artisans worked more than 36 years to create an army of terra-cotta warriors to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, in his afterlife
(E) more than 36 years were needed to complete the army of terra-cotta warriors that 700,000 artisans created 2,000 years ago to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, in his afterlife

这道题我看很多大牛的心经， 比如elory 的语法笔记，里面说CDE 里面的in his afterlife 放置无意义。。求解为什么in his afterlife在这里无意义。。。。

viennawong

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement个人认为只有兵马俑才可以作它的逻辑主语，其他的选项感觉主语没有这个这么清晰

cherryser

我个人是这么想的
In +名词 我觉得有两个作用1）对前面名词的修饰2）作为插入语。
回归到题目，CDE中in his afterlife是一个介词形式出现
1）如果是对前面名词的修饰的话，那么由于其前面有插入语，修饰对象不清晰（这个的感觉暂时无法清晰的写不出来，你体会下）
2）作为插入语的话，这个结构在句末了，插入语的功能体现不出来。而且一般同位语后是句子的结束。那么In his afterlife就更显得作用不大了。
3）如果需要它有意义的，我觉得应该把这结构接近其修饰对象

cookiezwy

我知道。。我就是好奇这个解释。。。我知道正确答案的呢0 0

lanshi

这道题只需一个知识点就可以解题：comparison。因为amry of terra-cotta rivaling pyramid and ancient cities所以划线句子的主语就应该是对等的兵马俑。那么只有A选项的主语是兵马俑，所以秒选A。