[求助]OG100求助:

虚无飘渺

[求助]OG100求助: 为什么同位语从句不对?

怎么排除E? 偶觉得挺好的一个同位语从句啊. OG说"in E, the negative cannot after

bans is illogical". 问一下:can not 为什么逻辑不通呢?

正确答案是C.

100. LACE>WisconsinLACE>, LACE>IllinoisLACE>, LACE>FloridaLACE>, and LACE>MinnesotaLACE> have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills

(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

steveyangxt

除了从句和分词的差异，还有一个重要的差异是正确答案把它做成壮语，e把它作为同位语了。

虚无飘渺

Thanks for your response.

My question is still hanging here. "that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings" and "bans" are 同位语.

That is, they are similar in meaning. I think "that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings" is the "ban".

Could you help me out? I am too .

mindfrees

妈妈禁止 我吃饭的时候说话

妈妈禁止 我吃饭的时候不能说

sammen

prohibit和not accept在意思上有差别,这是一;ban是法律法规,后一般用现在分词,表示持续性,that从句表示一次性.