返回列表 发帖

天山 3-Q20

Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.
A. as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established
B. as a method of the extraction of minerals well established
C. was a well-established method of mineral extraction
D. was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was
E. had been a method of mineral extraction, well established

可否解释一下为何 C 对啊,句型实在是看不太出来,而A又是哪里出了问题呢

收藏 分享

Well, I think C is the best answer.

In E, "had been" indicate that leaching was method of mineral extraction until 25 years ago and stopped being so thereafter, while this is not the case. To express a general condition, the past tense "was" is preferred.

Just my understanding, open for criticism.

TOP

E is the best choice

TOP

同意liuliyun同学的观点,我也选E

TOP

我觉得应该选E

划线部分后面紧跟着as early as the eighteenth century, 如果用C的话,非常的不顺畅,使得这部分显得nonsense.

而且,后面说到until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.就是说,Leaching法现在已经不用了,因此,E选项中用had been a method of mineral extraction非常贴切。

一家之言,欢迎批判.

TOP

这句leaching是主语,was是系动词,时态与the eighteenth century对应。所以c表达非常好。
如果选A,it多余,并且句子表达累赘含义模糊。
这是我的理解,还请大家指正。

好好学习,天天向上

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看