返回列表 发帖

请教大全-11-5

请教大全-11-5,谢谢!

In 1985 the city’s LACE w:st="on">LACENAME w:st="on">FineLACENAME> LACENAME w:st="on">ArtsLACENAME> LACETYPE w:st="on">MuseumLACETYPE>LACE> sold 30,000 single-entry tickets. In 1986 the city’s Folk Arts and Interior Design museums opened, and these three museums together sold over 80,000 such tickets that year. These museums were worth the cost, since more than twice as many citizens are now enjoying the arts.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the author’s assertion that more than twice as many citizens are now enjoying the arts?

(A) Most visitors to one museum also visit the other two.

(B) The cost of building the museums will not be covered by revenues generated by the sale of museum tickets.

(C) As the two new museums become better known, even more citizens will visit them.

(D) The city’s Fine Arts Museum did not experience a decrease in single-entry tickets sold in 1986.A

(E) Fewer museum entry tickets were sold in 1986 than the museum planners had hoped to sell.

请问为什么要选A?参观其中一个的同时参观另一个跟more than twice as many citizens are now enjoying the arts有什么关系?

原文说的是together sold over 80,000,那么不管参观一个参观两个还是三个,together起来确实是more than twice因为80000>30000*2 啊,想不通~~~请大家帮忙!谢谢!

收藏 分享

[em17]xie xie !!!

TOP

本题削弱的点在于不是它因削弱,原文的逻辑是票卖的多->人们很欣赏.

它因是不是处于欣赏角度才去的,因为去一个地方的一般都捎带着把另外的

也逛一下~!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看