返回列表 发帖

求助一道假设题

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.







The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that







(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues




(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy




(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research




(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research




(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists








请NN 帮忙解释一下这一题的思路,题目到底在讲什么呢?



收藏 分享

科学家们在进入这个研究领域并且接受那些和他们有共同创新思想的人作为同僚
这里accept as可以理解为接受,把...作为...认为
都是scientists发出的动作,前后也为并列,所以不用用被动

TOP

accept as 在这里是认为的的意思吗

TOP

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.

正常语序是 scientists enter ...  and accept  those with similar motivation as their colleagues. 这个 accept 的动作本来就是 scientists 发出的。

TOP

明白了,谢谢啊~
还想向你请教个句子
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar
这里accept 为什么不用被动呢?

TOP

不对,说错了,D选项说明两者是相反的,所以逻辑完整。。

TOP

这题是说科学家们通常把和自己有相同研究动机的人当作是同事,因此他们认为那些从事社会科普工作的科学家就不是他们的同事。

这里存在着一个逻辑上的GAP,也就是题目没有说明"从事科普工作”和“有研究动机”之间的关系

而D选项则说明了这两者是等价的,所以使得题目逻辑完整

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看