返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD30-Q35


For over a decade the most common policy advice given to developing countries by international development institutions has been to copy the export-oriented path of the newly industrializing countries, the celebrated NIC’s.
These economies—Brazil, Hong Kong, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan—burst into the world manufacturing market in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s; by 1978 these six economies, along with India, enjoyed unequaled growth rates for gross national product and for exports, with exports accounting for 70 percent of the developing world’s manufactured exports.
It was, therefore, not surprising that dozens of other countries attempted to follow their model, yet no countries—with the possible exceptions of Malaysia and Thailand—have even approached their success.
In “No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad and John Cavanagh search for the reasons behind these failures, identifying far-reaching changes in the global economy—from synthetic substitutes for commodity exports to unsustainable levels of foreign debt—as responsible for a glut economy offering little room for new entrants.
Despite these changes, the authors maintain, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund—the foremost international development institutions—have continued to promote the NIC path as the way for heavily indebted developing countries to proceed.
And yet the futility of this approach should, according to the authors, be all too apparent so many years into a period of reduced growth in world markets.
CA Q35:

Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?

A.
Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.

B.
By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.

C.
In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.

D.
In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.

E.
They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.

C在原文中并没有出现,不明白为什么对

A 错在哪里?请高手指点


收藏 分享

好一个“无以伦比”!!!
理解成不平等的人伤不起呀...

TOP

明白了,3Q

TOP

"highest"和文中的“enjoyed unequaled growth"是同义词。 ”无以伦比“的和”最好“的都是一回事。


A的ONLY错了。 文中没有说Only也没有说不Only。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看