|
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 710
- 经验
- 710 点
- 威望
- 70 点
- 金钱
- 70 ￥
- 魅力
- 70
|
请教OG12-53
The nineteenth-century chemistHumphry Davy
presented the results of his early experiments in his
"Essay on Heat and Light," a critique of all chemistry
since Robert Bovle as well as a vision of a new
chemistry that Davy hoped to found.
(A) a critique of all chemistry sinceRobert Boyle as
well as a vision of a
(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle
and also his envisioning of a
(0 a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and
envisioning as well
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle
forward and also a vision of
(E) critiquing all the chemistry donesince Robert
Boyle as well as his own envisioning of
解析：Parallelism; Rhetoricalconstruction
The main objective of the sentence is to describe
"Essay on Heat and Light" as Davy's presentation
of his own experiments and to further explain
that the essay served as both a critique of previous
chemistry and a vision of a new kind of chemistry.
The clearest, most effective form for providing
this explanation of the essay s function is tomake
critique and vision both appositives of "Essay on
Heat and Light," and to present them in a parallel
structure.
A Correct. Tne phrasesdescribing the essay s
function are presented in parallel form.
B Critique and his envisioning are not parallel;
the phrase and also his envisioning is
unnecessarily wordy;
it is also unclear to
whom his refers.
C The two descriptors are notparallel.
D Tne two descriptors are notparallel.
E Tne meaning is confused in the assertion
that Davy critiqued his own vision of
chemistry.
我不明白的是B选项的最后一项错误，说不清楚his 指代什么，但是原文里面his只指代这一个人啊，有什么错误么？
请大牛指点 |
|
