返回列表 发帖

kui-cr-8/10-8


Until now, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

  1. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.

  2. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.

  3. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.

  4. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.

  5. The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.

选哪个呢?理由。

收藏 分享

应该是D,将D取非,Adults contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza

则原文结论no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray。不成立。

TOP

个人认为D.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看