返回列表 发帖

GWD-9-Q33 貌似没人问过

原文:

Scientists studying the physiology of dinosaurs have long debated whether dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded. Those who suspect they were warm-blooded point out that dinosaur bone is generally fibro-lamellar in nature; because fibro-lamellar bone is formed quickly, the bone fibrils, or filaments, are laid down haphazardly. Consistent with their rapid growth rate, warm-blooded animals, such as birds and mammals, tend to produce fibro-lamellar bone, whereas reptiles, which are slow-growing and cold-blooded, generally produce bone in which fibrils are laid down parallel to each other. Moreover, like the bone of birds and mammals, dinosaur bone tends to be highly vascularized, or filled with blood vessels. These characteristics, first recognized in the 1930’s, were documented in the 1960’s by de Ricqlès, who found highly vascularized, fibro-lamellar bone in several groups of dinosaurs. In the 1970’s, Bakker cited these characteristics as evidence for the warm-bloodedness of dinosaurs. Although de Ricqlès urged caution, arguing for an intermediate type of dinosaur physiology, a generation of paleontologists has come to believe that dinosaur bone is mammalianlike. In the 1980’s, however, Bakker’s contention began to be questioned, as a number of scientists found growth rings in the bones of various dinosaurs that are much like those in modern reptiles. Bone growth in reptiles is periodic in nature, producing a series of concentric rings in the bone, not unlike the growth rings of a tree. Recently, Chinsamy investigated the bones of two dinosaurs from the early Jurassic period (208-187 million years ago), and found that these bones also had growth rings; however, they were also partially fibro-lamellar in nature. Chinsamy’s work raises a question central to the debate over dinosaur physiology: did dinosaurs form fibro-lamellar bone because of an innately high metabolic rate associated with warm-bloodedness or because of periods of unusually fast growth that occurred under favorable environmental conditions? (Although modern reptiles generally do not form fibro-lamellar bone, juvenile crocodilesraised under optimal environmental conditions do.) This question remains unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence into account, one cannot make a definitive statement about dinosaur physiology on the basis of dinosaur bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an intermediate pattern of bone structure because their physiology was neither typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.




The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was




A.unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès
B.unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers
C.indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time




D.warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists




E.influential in the recent work of Chinsamy




D为正确答案,A错在哪里呢?
文章最后一段不是说remain unanswered吗?尽管后面有提到intermediate的事情,但是也是用的may be啊,怎么能是D中的warrented呢?


收藏 分享

the caution was warranted 担心是有道理的(不是多余的)

TOP

科学家长期争论,恐龙是热血还是冷血。1970年Bakker引用恐龙的骨骼特点作为是热血的证据。
虽然Ricqlès提出了要谨慎论断,但一代的科学家都相信了Bakker的说法。
然而,1980年,Bakker的说法又遭到质疑。
至今,这个问题也没有确定的答案。
●问题:作者对Ricqlès提出的要‘谨慎论断’的态度。
●答案:根据1980年后,Bakker的说法又遭到质疑。所以,Ricqlès提出要‘谨慎论断’,是完全正确的。

TOP

我也错了这题,后来再看题目以后我认为题目的意思是说

“caution”本身的性质,而非caution的内容是否warranted。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看