gwd 8 19 爭議題新問

bobchowz

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Concerned about financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65.Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians.Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because ________.


A.They rely entirely on the government pension for their income


B.Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check


C.They buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation


D.The pension was increased when the number of elderly Runagians below the poverty level reached an all-time high


E.In Runagia children typically supplement the income of elderly parents, but only by enough to provide them with a comfortable living
請問:
1.C選項的思維是如下 請問哪裡有錯?
雖然題目已說通膨可忽略 但是假設政府補助老人1000 老人常買的東西上漲了 的確可以說明 政府補助的錢幫助有限啊 ?

2.E選項是否過度推理了 ?
討論區都說 " E就是指，即使政府增加，收入也不会增长，因为孩子可能少给 "
但是這根本是過度推理 E選項只說補助父母到可維持生活水平 但並不能因此推論政府補助老人 子女就會減少錢呀?

haoye12321

但是c有个缺陷，如果政府给的增长超过了老人买的这些东西增长，那其实政府给的增长还是有用的

flyfairy019

可是明明记得有道类似的题目说就是因为inflation是一个广泛的概念，apply to all products,而老年人常用的保健品价格增长超快，所以经济水平没有提高，C只是改写了一下正确答案嘛，我认为是C

gmatvictors

increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians ==> C must be wrong... 题目说了inflation可以忽略不计

zhengqingku

同问C！

dypig1234

逻辑题里面，只要合理的推测，没有什么是“过分推理”的。。。。

zhangws

E, 政府给的多，孩子就给的少。这样，老人手中的money不变。

而C. 通货膨胀题目已经提到可以忽略。所以不用考虑了。假象。通

胀是客观的，政府不给钱，通胀依然存在，所以给钱还是比不给

better啊。 对吧。