LSAT 11-IV-19

uniqueness

19 Many people change their wills on their own every few years, in response to significant changes in their personal or financial circumstances. This practice can create a problem foe the executor when these people are careless and do not date their wills: the executor will then often know neither which one of several undated wills is the most recent, nor whether the will drawn up last has ever been found. Therefore, people should not only date their wills but also state in any new will which will it supersedes, for then there would not be a problem to begin with.
The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
(A) treats a partial solution to the stated problem as though it were a complete solution.
(B) Fails to distinguish between prevention of a problem and successful containment of the adverse effects that the problem might cause.
(C) Proposes a solution to the stated problem that does not actually solve the problem but merely makes someone else responsible for solving the problem.
(D) Claims that a certain action would be a change for the better without explicitly considering what negative consequences the action might have.
(E) Proposes that a certain action be based on information that would be unavailable at the time proposed for that action.

这道题在A和E中徘徊，最后还是选了E，答案是A.但是为什莫原文提出的不是complete
solution呢? E为什莫不对?

uniqueness

bnbf, 谢谢你的解答。我明白了

bnbf

(A) 题以上还是不能确认那个最最新的；一份遗嘱，虽然知道它取代的是哪一份，又怎么知道有没有更新的取代它呢？

(E) The availability of the information needed for the action proposed is not clear to us, we can NOT say it is unavaialible for sure, mostly it's on case by case.