返回列表 发帖

各位帮忙看一上这道逻辑题啦

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.

B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.

C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.

D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.

E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
收藏 分享

答案是C。谢谢你的解释!

TOP

我觉得是C,对吗?
题目的意思是说为了减少犯罪,统治者会做一些事...他们一部分的努力是否定囚犯继续

上大学课程,但是这种做法与他们最高的目标相违背,因为在被释放之后,那些选择了这

些课程的人比没选的人总的来说犯罪少
A、这句话是瞎扯谈
B、文中没有提到general public,无关选项
C、说那些选择读这些课程的人在读之前没有比其他人犯罪的可能性低,再是得出结论的

前提,如果没有这个假设,那么文中的结论不成立
D、讲了在狱中读课程,文中没有涉及,无关
E、把政府的最高目标胡扯了一下,无关

TOP

答案是C

TOP

是选B吗?!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看