返回列表 发帖

[求助]大全2-8

Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above? (A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen. (B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant. (C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons. (D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970’s than it did in the 1960’s. (E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

我不知道为什么B对。最低工资水平保持不变说明什么啊?好比1960年的最低工资水平是100元,10年没变,雇主一直觉得100元太贵,所以青少年失业率一直上升。现在提出新标准,最低水平变为80元,雇主觉得可以接受,于是青少年失业率就不会再上升了。B怎么就可以削弱啊?

收藏 分享

thanks  you   very   much  !!!

TOP

我个人认为B相对最好了。原文的推倒是因为政府设立的最低的工资标准。使小孩子的失业率上升的说明2者有因果关系。要weaken的话,要么断桥,要么他因。而B说在最低工资不变的时候失业率也上升,就是说2者没有直接的关系了,这是个很明显的断桥。
把所有的困苦都看做是有意义的,是生命对你的磨练,也许,是为了让你成大事而做准备。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看