返回列表 发帖

OG-112

112. In an attempt to promote the widespread use of paper rather than plastic, and thus reduce

nonbiodegradable waster, the council of a small town plans to ban the sale of disposable plastic goods for which substitutes made of paper exist. The council argues that since most paper is entirely biodegradable, paper goods are environmentally preferable.

Which of the following, if true, indicates that the plan to ban the sale of disposable plastic goods is ill suited to the town council’s environmental goals?

(A) Although biodegradable plastic goods are now available, members of the town council believe

biodegradable paper goods to be safer for the environment.

(B) The paper factory at which most of the towns-people are employed plans to increase production of biodegradable paper goods.

(C) After other towns enacted similar bans on the sale of plastic goods, the environmental benefits were not discernible for several years.

(D) Since most townspeople prefer plastic goods to paper goods in many instances, they are likely to purchase them in neighboring towns where plastic goods are available for sale.

(E) Products other than those derived from wood pulp are often used in the manufacture of paper goods that are entirely biodegradable.

答案是D, 这个我明白.但是答案C,我觉得好像也行.OG的解释为:Choice C suggests that environmental benefits would ensue, albeit not immediately. 但我觉得看不出would ensue

请指教!!!

收藏 分享

明白了,谢谢!!

TOP

逻辑上的一个大问题,你可能在AWA上也会遇到的,就是C这类横向比较。首先,类似的城镇用了相同的政策效果不明显,不能证明这个镇用了也会效果不明显。两者之间不一定可比。另外,OG说的,C只讲了“几年之内没有看到效果”,也就是说几年后可能会看到效果的,只是效果来的不是马上。这就是albeit not immediately的。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看