返回列表 发帖

[讨论]OG11-13

13. Wood smoke contains dangerous toxins that cause changes in human cells. Because wood smoke presents such a high health risk, legislation is needed to regulate the use of open-air fires and wood-burning stoves.

Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the argument above?


A.The amount of dangerous toxins contained in wood smoke is much less than the amount contained in an equal volume of automobile exhaust.

B.Within the jurisdiction covered by the proposed legislation, most heating and cooking is done with oil or natural gas.

C.Smoke produced by coal-burning stoves is significantly more toxic than smoke from wood-burning stoves.

D.No significant beneficial effect on air quality would result if open-air fires were banned within the jurisdiction covered by the proposed legislation.

E.In valleys where wood is used as the primary heating fuel, the concentration of smoke results in poor air quality.

答案E.

我认为B也支持啊:因为立法限制,所以most heating and cooking is done with oil or natural gas.脑筋转不过弯来,请各位指教。

收藏 分享

D:There is no advantage in legislation.

TOP

No significant beneficial effect 是说没有好处。如果禁令没有好处,那么D就是削弱。

TOP

为什么D错呢?

D.No significant beneficial effect on air quality would result if open-air fires

were banned within the jurisdiction covered by the proposed legislation.

我对D的理解:

在jurisdiction的辖区, 禁止open-air-fires 没有重大的利益影响,那么也是支持to

regulate the use of open-air-fires, 应该也是支持啊?

为什么不正确?

请教。。。

TOP

这么说我明白了,谢谢。

TOP

答案b的意思是说在这个法案覆盖的区域,绝大多数的取暖和做饭都使用的天然汽和油,也就

是说没有用wood,那么出台这么一个法案还有什么意义呢,显然是削弱性。e答案说,因为是个

山谷,所以wood产生的烟严重影响了空气质量,当然更应该禁木头燃烧

TOP

帮你顶一下,直到斑竹牛人蹦出来

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看