prep-2-17

smartcoco

17

 

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.  Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.  Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

 

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

 

(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available

 

(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals

 

(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering

 

(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer

 

(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

 答案C 但我觉得E也是削弱

 如果看不到celebrity了 那和没改前没区别阿... 装修费白花

xiaoxinxin

这题题干我就不懂    哪位NN  能给翻译下

算是WEAKEN题目   那D 为什么不可以啊？

Springwaters

1.理解E的意思就明白E无关: 有足够的TALL TABLES给感兴趣的顾客,除TALL TABLES有VIEW外外,坐在其他类型座位的顾客就没有VIEW啦.

其它座位的情况和原文推理无关.不要将原文的EXCEPT丢了.

2.C关键在于理解GENERALIZATION指的是什么: 它其实指原文这句话diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables

yubyuber

E确实是个迷惑选项，实战时就不用考虑那么多了，直接选C就行了，C是明显削弱的。

题目的整体逻辑是: place some tall table -> less lingering（更短的逗留时间）-> increase profit

C直接把逻辑链的中间打断了，就是说less lingering不成立，所以C对

E: too many tall table -> no view  其实是无关项，既不加强也不削弱。为什么你会觉得它削弱呢？原因是因为你在无意识中加入了你自己的逻辑，使E的逻辑链变成了 too many tall table -> no view
  -> fewer custom -> not increase profit

记住，一定不要加入自己的逻辑，根据原文我们其实不能得到no view -> fewer custom的, 不信我们来试试，原文说tall table can get a better view -> custom prefer tall table （注意原文并没有说more tall tables -> more customs，只是在坐在tall table上的人的逗留时间上做文章，所以从这一点我们只能得出隐含推理more tall tables -> more customs prefer to sit on tall table(客户总数不变也可以) -> less lingering ）

整个逻辑很复杂，就连我上面做的推理都有许多漏洞，所以GMAC出的题目有的时候也不可能能做到题目的每个细节都那么严谨的，有时候也是5个选项都有漏洞，但是我们不需要太钻牛角尖，心里明白GMAC到底想让你选哪个就可以（按照GMAC的套路来）。这只是一个测试能力的考试（还不很准），需要你在1分40秒的时间内做出的推理肯定是不用拐太多弯的哦，你只需要按题目的逻辑线来就可以了。

smartcoco

E 为什么错了呢？？？？？？？？