请教OG-109

yiuoioityo

109. Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the applicant would suffer a hear heart . The presding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers.

The use of this court ruling as part of the law could not be effective in regulating employement pratices if which of the following were true?


B:No really accepted methods exists for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation.

不明白B为何是假设,OG的解释我也不太明白.能帮助讲讲吗?谢谢.

lololo

首先这道题目不是assumption，而是weaken！

前提是

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the applicant would suffer a hear heart


结论为 The presding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers


演绎方向为：前提结论形！

所以weaken 只有两种思路，1、断桥  2、他因否认结论

答案为 No really accepted methods exists for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation

否认没有标准来测定90%的比率，所以为断桥削弱！

lololo

首先这道题目不是assumption，而是weaken！

前提是

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the applicant would suffer a hear heart


结论为 The presding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers


演绎方向为：前提结论形！

所以weaken 只有两种思路，1、断桥  2、他因否认结论

答案为 No really accepted methods exists for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation

否认没有标准来测定90%的比率，所以为断桥削弱！