|
- 精华
- 301
- 积分
- 162885
- 经验
- 162885 点
- 威望
- 15221 点
- 金钱
- 43960 ￥
- 魅力
- 28358
|
P26 Q; m' U- e8 h& W; t m
4 B! o! @+ L+ _: M7 L4 S1 ?2 {
/ J6 B/ x% O' V/ P: G
) t; a( N+ W$ e4 ]# `; u4 v; A
Moreover
8 S: w9 c( ?* X
% C; V& U0 C- J+ W- W- U. m: Q( P8 d2 c4 t' [: @" o
1 c, U& q1 L& F6 q5 cnevertheless
& H' O I: {( D* D
# k8 y/ ?1 c0 _% \ L5 `3 @0 B
$ z6 z% d0 i" N! t2 _
- e, M% W6 g6 lUltimately
" y, N% j4 a$ L+ C5 c) \" b: d
2 q, g+ ]1 {3 z3 Q4 R- F9 Q
. G7 A! Q# l# E7 C9 V" p0 p9 D
5 l3 ]8 R7 }0 P; t8 c& U# `by the same token
8 |" `" v9 D$ `! ~+ {1 Y
7 o5 ]- J. t2 T# m5 k5 C6 w! r: l: N- F2 M4 V
8 G3 \" Q ]- w* B
in light of $ @% s2 c, U) |# j- [4 J
, p+ ]5 L9 ]2 G5 Y7 ^
* c2 ?% p5 L3 q) s, S. {
+ d+ Q/ l e4 H9 `, f) zConstitute sufficient evidence
+ a+ H3 Y4 Z9 Y1 |( z. J5 o- F9 W0 a5 t0 u/ T
* e- a" S" \8 {2 x; i$ }9 {1 H( u
) D+ k) B# T4 uGiven the matters discussed above
; c9 X1 l. r) _8 Y
4 c% V& ^3 t: q3 n4 V O: t( R! S6 M! ]- q" W$ k; b/ q& m, c6 |
# }5 w' A6 E ~9 nThis argument is not persuasive as it stands
2 p: l9 G- v% X) Y5 N
( g# \/ t3 q( O' o
5 a$ u& ` Y# C( g
% Y5 ~2 K7 G0 Q2 e' f- T) B8 @xx is unsounded to establish a general conclusion& N: e8 a1 x# C u2 f
* M7 O( m/ K. v0 F: f/ M+ X R6 y! j) {7 o! V) A
1 Q+ ]. `1 A6 h+ S. c; G
it is judicious to admit point of the issue even though such point may suffer from some explicit shortcoming
- S- [+ |0 F, `3 M/ B5 @$ k; F: l$ |) c% M
% e7 e* E0 j4 U3 m0 T
1 Q6 V* `8 o0 {3 Z! c, J) n+ r2 c8 s$ {2 x
- }% ~) y F r* ~ j# `4 Y
; G6 e1 ~ b' a0 g3 ]; Y6 D# E5 i5 @: X* L3 v {. o
2 ?* ]: I# N% ~. t8 EP3
3 J4 S1 H& g! x( ^+ q( m& Z9 q- q3 H- U
" q; v4 W; g6 ^* M6 c L# ^% o. L% V7 x3 J" }) p7 b
Erroneous
( d0 B' [' ^$ C7 l: d
# ]: P' D! a& g6 E, s% n: E6 f9 ]: `; C
7 p2 z$ s( T) X! z3 @( Q% omerely3 }, s% d, [) h2 o( X }
2 E7 H- }0 `8 y3 {6 Z
' h# ~' U) y' k2 l/ b! _
3 F5 A4 _5 P* s+ woverwhelming
* `. n5 f& C5 i( q- e; h0 z1 Y/ x) Q `3 k+ ]3 x
. f0 } n# m* M* Y5 A" q- P
# Q' `) B2 d6 ]! k( S. Usuperficial; q" @- U/ E2 U& }
* x/ p+ r( `* D( J( y
+ P( V! B3 x6 `5 ~+ R5 ^, u% S5 S* @/ l6 P* w. K" M4 T7 c, e; P
omit) ]0 U9 r0 X5 }. u- I/ f- X
; X; r9 [2 X3 J. w4 @
7 P' b4 h- i$ Z, c. z) B2 M& U c# R/ E% A5 H8 H3 I9 K0 Z" x2 s
nullify
8 u+ S/ Q+ E9 P2 c5 D( p3 L3 r( j* E; d# P" T
4 T/ g Q* L2 S. n4 h1 J- c1 m0 |2 V( c v7 Q
overstate
8 ?" `% D; M, C. E1 V; j
+ m) B7 w% ~# t. F6 V/ ], c3 D m4 g
7 C t: P J* h: M1 A) A
drawback
# S$ J1 Q& s& U, ^$ C$ b8 ^- K! ]$ I; G1 V+ Z' C3 i2 I
) G% L/ g% m3 a& Y c
- O( L; c/ ?3 P
gratuitous, o- z: H! d+ ?$ A7 `( f4 m# g9 n
7 V1 I; k+ d( l7 n4 c
' D- w6 K2 ^0 L0 | N6 x. x, p3 @3 r" @1 O
neglect' @( C3 o7 _$ G1 a
4 c/ K$ l0 b w. F
' _2 y% C) s- B& b5 N2 ]
) |9 ~, [* k! s* p
lose sight of
. k+ r' q' l( j4 ?. k( a. Y) D- A6 y1 x" @% q" V3 H, t
# O' W7 _# J/ Q: m! z( T- W
' _4 J4 @; i8 @4 j9 E- F" s
skeptical+ W2 F* g& q- c- l, s- |0 r
; T( b1 a7 X3 C# y( e% a
1 B) j4 r- [/ |$ j9 W/ e
% n" m9 D8 {: I1 O! b( fexaggerate
4 Y' \7 Z7 g" l( R6 a) o( V8 `6 S. |. k9 y
( X# X5 |0 G5 U! a/ ~
) K, g. K8 g3 Q# ~) efallacy, fallacious8 F/ }. P% X5 A+ w
, G1 m- J* S5 m9 z1 q% D; q: U. w; q! d" S8 ?9 i
1 l& L: \; h% Y% G* n# Scoincide
N" J/ f' p1 M! h
( \4 M& H' ]. D6 e
; ~0 v7 E$ @4 y+ d/ R& ]/ V. R
vague
' _& W* D& j7 p5 S) C
+ n7 c' p& ~, J, s' Z! _
, A' j$ ?+ X: g9 t
. V: R( m7 a1 w" D& Dimcompatible
! ^+ X% k, ~! k+ e. s
: K* H; J7 Z; D* U3 h% }8 e5 T. _& d3 m8 U% o8 f4 g2 h; X
2 I% u! K1 }8 C# t* e% s Y8 Funwarranted
: Y: g7 t" W7 c4 {" p# g2 ^
6 ~- g" R- K6 X- o7 Z
6 G2 H/ A- w% m% C- M
: [3 c( q! q9 P9 k, M3 u8 adissimilarity
! T6 m+ R- u9 V |
|
/ h# A! K: [' Z, z
