返回列表 发帖

大全-15-3

3. Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching to cleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available to Northern Power for reducing harmful emissions from its plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissions more than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not be more expensive than installing scrubbers.

(B) Northern Power can choose from among various kinds of scrubbers, some of which are more effective than others.

(C) Northern Power is not necessarily committed to reducing harmful emissions from its plants.

(D) Harmful emissions from Northern Power’s plants cannot be reduced more by using both methods together than by the installation of scrubbers alone.D

(E) Aside from harmful emissions from the smokestacks of its plants, the activities of Northern Power do not cause significant air pollution.

为什么是D呢?这个为什么是假设?我选的是E!求指点!

收藏 分享

终于make sense了~

谢谢!!

TOP

题目说by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.也就是说northern power装了scrubbers后,就是她能做得最多了的。也就是假设即使两种方法都用,也不会再多了。这就是D说的。D是正确的。

TOP

我也觉得是E。。。取非一下,NP还产生别的污染,不是就可以消弱文中:by installing scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing the most that can be done to reduce harmful emissions from its plants.吗?

想不通。。。

C说一定要一起用,文中说SCRUBBER最有效,那都用它不是最好么?为什么假设一定要一起用呢?

求教~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看