The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C.
Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites.
In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans,
The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually
Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a majkor city of
Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.
In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists. Evidence ,it would
Useful to determine which of the following ?
1A) whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities
2B) Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts
produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avaris
3C) Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan
4D) Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose
found at Avaris
5E) whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been
found in Egypt
我选A,但也有人说B.
不知道哪个更对?请NN指点 | 
