返回列表 发帖

麻烦各位,问:og89

89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.

(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were

(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were

(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were(C)

(E) every thirty-two pupils now has one microcomputer, four times as many as

这题的答案不难知道,但是由个问题不明白:把正确答案补全是个什么样子?比较的对象是整个“x for y”?

there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were 1/4 microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils?麻烦各位了,下面是og解释。

use the construction “one X for every thirty-two Y’s” to describe the ratio of computers to pupils, but only C, the best answer, is error-free. In A, are does not agree with the subject, one microcomputer; furthermore, in A, B, and D, than is used where as is required. Choices D and E reorder and garble the “one X...” construction, making four times as many refer illogically to pupils.

收藏 分享

QUOTE:
以下是引用小巧玲珑在2009-2-4 7:15:00的发言:

同意你说的,“現在的比例是1:32, "這個比例"是4年前的4倍”。

也同样不明白,为什么C是"there were" 而不是 "there was"?

高人帮忙啦!

as many as已经明确了比较的是具体数字而不是比例,如果是比例的话应该用as great as更对阿

所以应该是were而非was

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用feierer在2009-2-2 10:11:00的发言:

我覺得題目的意思是說現在的比例是1:32, "這個比例"是4年前的4倍!

也就是說4年前的比例應該是1:128 (每128個人才擁有1台電腦), 雖然暗示, 可是並沒有提到是電腦總數增加還是學生人數減少...

因此, 我還是搞不懂為什麼正確答案C後面是"there were", 而不是跟前面的 "there is now..." 平行用 "as many as there was four years ago."

看了前輩們的帖子, 也還是沒找到明確的解釋, 請問有誰可以出手相救一下嗎?

同意你说的,“現在的比例是1:32, "這個比例"是4年前的4倍”。

也同样不明白,为什么C是"there were" 而不是 "there was"?

高人帮忙啦!

TOP

QUOTE:
以下是引用wumeier在2009-2-3 7:51:00的发言:
我認為這邊c選項中原句後面是省略了 "every 128 pupils for one computer" ,意思表達跟"one computer for every 128 pupils " 是一樣的, 但是前者要用there were, 後者要用there was

every 128 pupils for one computer

every one computer for 128 pupils

似乎意思不同耶….

前后不一致,这样的理解好象怪怪的

我顶

TOP

我認為這邊c選項中原句後面是省略了 "every 128 pupils for one computer" ,意思表達跟"one computer for every 128 pupils " 是一樣的, 但是前者要用there were, 後者要用there was

TOP

我覺得題目的意思是說現在的比例是1:32, "這個比例"是4年前的4倍!

也就是說4年前的比例應該是1:128 (每128個人才擁有1台電腦), 雖然暗示, 可是並沒有提到是電腦總數增加還是學生人數減少...

因此, 我還是搞不懂為什麼正確答案C後面是"there were", 而不是跟前面的 "there is now..." 平行用 "as many as there was four years ago."

看了前輩們的帖子, 也還是沒找到明確的解釋, 請問有誰可以出手相救一下嗎?

TOP

谢谢你的回答!的确我没注意many的问题,太笨了,这个句子实际上不是两个there be的并列,而是第二个there be身处一个比修饰成分中,这个修饰成分修饰第一个there be中的computer。还有个问题: 修饰比例是不是要用great?

TOP

首先要强调的是X for Y的结构表达的仅仅是比例关系,而X have Y则表达了具体数字的关系;

原文想要表达的是:现在电脑和学生的比例是1:32,(电脑总数)是4年前的4倍。整个句子前其实有个暗含的句子,比如:There are 2000 microcomputers now. 那么4年前电脑就是500台,所以在这里应该用复数were而不是was;

但是我们总是觉得似乎应该用was来同样地表达比例关系,问题在于as many as已经明确了比较的是具体数字而不是比例。

题外话:表示比例的句子后的比较,可以是另一个‘比例’也可以是‘具体数字’。

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看